“Writin’ain’t my thang”: creating high school student writers with ongoing support through an urban school–teacher education partnership

Tonya B. Perry, Teaira McMurtry
{"title":"“Writin’ain’t my thang”: creating high school student writers with ongoing support through an urban school–teacher education partnership","authors":"Tonya B. Perry, Teaira McMurtry","doi":"10.1108/etpc-05-2023-0044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to explore the impact of a year-long writing intervention located in an urban high school in partnership with a university teacher education professor and the students. The goals were as follows: to increase student self-efficacy about writing overall; to increase the number of students who successfully improve scores on writing assessments; and to increase ACT exam scores, making students more qualified candidates for college admission.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe main method used for the research is a quantitative longitudinal study method, which involves collecting from each student, at pre-intervention and post-intervention, a writing sample. There are 54 students in the study.\n\n\nFindings\nFindings showed an increase in student proficiency overall, with an increase of 0.53 holistically. Effective writing instruction asks students to write often to develop their writing will and skill. There are many more factors beyond the teaching of “ACT prep” writing skills that must be considered, particularly when teaching marginalized groups. This study found that the following are important: building and sustaining positive rapport; using their language as part of the learning process; creating space for students to write regularly; writing on a variety of topics; reflecting on and monitoring their writing; and receiving timely and targeted feedback.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis paper discusses the impact of the writing intervention and describes the practices that were a part of the intervention for marginalized students in an urban school to increase their writing scores.\n","PeriodicalId":428767,"journal":{"name":"English Teaching: Practice & Critique","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"English Teaching: Practice & Critique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/etpc-05-2023-0044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore the impact of a year-long writing intervention located in an urban high school in partnership with a university teacher education professor and the students. The goals were as follows: to increase student self-efficacy about writing overall; to increase the number of students who successfully improve scores on writing assessments; and to increase ACT exam scores, making students more qualified candidates for college admission. Design/methodology/approach The main method used for the research is a quantitative longitudinal study method, which involves collecting from each student, at pre-intervention and post-intervention, a writing sample. There are 54 students in the study. Findings Findings showed an increase in student proficiency overall, with an increase of 0.53 holistically. Effective writing instruction asks students to write often to develop their writing will and skill. There are many more factors beyond the teaching of “ACT prep” writing skills that must be considered, particularly when teaching marginalized groups. This study found that the following are important: building and sustaining positive rapport; using their language as part of the learning process; creating space for students to write regularly; writing on a variety of topics; reflecting on and monitoring their writing; and receiving timely and targeted feedback. Originality/value This paper discusses the impact of the writing intervention and describes the practices that were a part of the intervention for marginalized students in an urban school to increase their writing scores.
“写作不是我的事”:通过城市学校-教师教育合作伙伴关系,在持续的支持下,培养高中生作家
本研究的目的是探讨在一所城市高中,与一名大学教师、教授和学生合作进行为期一年的写作干预的影响。研究目标如下:提高学生整体写作自我效能感;增加在写作评估中成功提高分数的学生人数;并提高ACT考试成绩,使学生更有资格进入大学。设计/方法/方法本研究使用的主要方法是定量纵向研究方法,包括在干预前和干预后从每个学生那里收集一份写作样本。书房里有54名学生。调查结果显示,学生的熟练程度总体上有所提高,整体上提高了0.53。有效的写作指导要求学生经常写作,以发展他们的写作意愿和技巧。除了“ACT准备”写作技巧的教学之外,还有很多因素必须考虑,尤其是在教授边缘群体的时候。这项研究发现以下几点很重要:建立和维持积极的关系;使用他们的语言作为学习过程的一部分;为学生创造定期写作的空间;撰写各种主题的文章;反思和监督他们的写作;并获得及时和有针对性的反馈。原创性/价值本文讨论了写作干预的影响,并描述了作为干预的一部分,在城市学校的边缘学生,以提高他们的写作分数的做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信