Assessment of Real-time Bioaerosol Particle Counters using Reference Chamber Experiments

G. Lieberherr, Kevin Auderset, B. Calpini, B. Clot, B. Crouzy, M. Gysel-Beer, T. Konzelmann, J. Manzano, A. Mihajlović, A. Moallemi, D. O’Connor, B. Šikoparija, Eric Sauvageat, F. Tummon, K. Vasilatou
{"title":"Assessment of Real-time Bioaerosol Particle Counters using Reference Chamber Experiments","authors":"G. Lieberherr, Kevin Auderset, B. Calpini, B. Clot, B. Crouzy, M. Gysel-Beer, T. Konzelmann, J. Manzano, A. Mihajlović, A. Moallemi, D. O’Connor, B. Šikoparija, Eric Sauvageat, F. Tummon, K. Vasilatou","doi":"10.5194/amt-2021-136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. This study presents the first reference calibrations of three commercially available bioaerosol detectors. The Droplet Measurement Technologies WIBS-NEO, Plair Rapid-E, and Swisens Poleno were compared with a primary standard for particle number concentrations at the Federal Institute for Metrology METAS. Polystyrene (PSL) spheres were used to assess absolute particle counts for diameters from 0.5 μm to 10 μm. For the three devices, counting efficiency was found to be strongly dependent on particle size. The results confirm the expected detection range for which the instruments were designed. While the WIBS-NEO achieves its highest efficiency at smaller particles, e.g. 90 % for 0.9 μm diameter, the Plair Rapid-E performs best for larger particles, with an efficiency of 58 % for particles with a diameter of 10 μm. The Swisens Poleno is also designed for larger particles, but operates well from 2 μm. However, the exact counting efficiency of the Poleno could not be evaluated as the cut-off diameter range of the integrated concentrator unit was not completely covered. In further experiments, three different types of fluorescent particles were tested to investigate the fluorescent detection capabilities of the Plair Rapid-E and the Swisens Poleno. Both instruments showed good agreement with the reference data. While the challenge to produce known concentrations of larger particles above 10 μm or even fresh pollen particles remain, the approach presented in this paper provides a potential standardised validation method that can be used to assess counting efficiency and fluorescence measurements of automatic bioaerosol monitoring devices.\n","PeriodicalId":441110,"journal":{"name":"Atmospheric Measurement Techniques Discussions","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atmospheric Measurement Techniques Discussions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2021-136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

Abstract. This study presents the first reference calibrations of three commercially available bioaerosol detectors. The Droplet Measurement Technologies WIBS-NEO, Plair Rapid-E, and Swisens Poleno were compared with a primary standard for particle number concentrations at the Federal Institute for Metrology METAS. Polystyrene (PSL) spheres were used to assess absolute particle counts for diameters from 0.5 μm to 10 μm. For the three devices, counting efficiency was found to be strongly dependent on particle size. The results confirm the expected detection range for which the instruments were designed. While the WIBS-NEO achieves its highest efficiency at smaller particles, e.g. 90 % for 0.9 μm diameter, the Plair Rapid-E performs best for larger particles, with an efficiency of 58 % for particles with a diameter of 10 μm. The Swisens Poleno is also designed for larger particles, but operates well from 2 μm. However, the exact counting efficiency of the Poleno could not be evaluated as the cut-off diameter range of the integrated concentrator unit was not completely covered. In further experiments, three different types of fluorescent particles were tested to investigate the fluorescent detection capabilities of the Plair Rapid-E and the Swisens Poleno. Both instruments showed good agreement with the reference data. While the challenge to produce known concentrations of larger particles above 10 μm or even fresh pollen particles remain, the approach presented in this paper provides a potential standardised validation method that can be used to assess counting efficiency and fluorescence measurements of automatic bioaerosol monitoring devices.
利用参考室实验评估实时生物气溶胶粒子计数器
摘要本研究首次提出了三种市售生物气溶胶探测器的参考校准。将WIBS-NEO、Plair Rapid-E和Swisens Poleno液滴测量技术与联邦计量研究所METAS的颗粒数浓度主要标准进行比较。用聚苯乙烯(PSL)球测定直径为0.5 μm至10 μm范围内的绝对颗粒数。对于这三种装置,计数效率被发现强烈依赖于颗粒大小。结果证实了所设计仪器的预期检测范围。WIBS-NEO在直径为0.9 μm的小颗粒上的效率最高,达到90%,而Plair Rapid-E在直径为10 μm的大颗粒上的效率最高,达到58%。Swisens Poleno也为更大的颗粒设计,但在2 μm范围内运行良好。然而,Poleno的精确计数效率无法评估,因为集成选矿厂单元的截止直径范围没有完全覆盖。在进一步的实验中,测试了三种不同类型的荧光颗粒,以研究Plair Rapid-E和Swisens Poleno的荧光检测能力。两种仪器均与参考数据吻合良好。虽然产生已知浓度大于10 μm的大颗粒甚至新鲜花粉颗粒的挑战仍然存在,但本文提出的方法提供了一种潜在的标准化验证方法,可用于评估自动生物气溶胶监测装置的计数效率和荧光测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信