Video Caravan in Engaging Development: Reflexivity, Agency and Bridging Communication

Thanuja Mummidi
{"title":"Video Caravan in Engaging Development: Reflexivity, Agency and Bridging Communication","authors":"Thanuja Mummidi","doi":"10.1177/2277436X211028973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relation between indigenous people and development agencies is much discussed in anthropology (Bicker et al., 2004; Pottier et al., 2003; Sillitoe et al., 2002). This relation is more often than not, one of conflict. A conflict that builds from distrust by the people on the development agent and disrespect from the latter on the former. The research on which this article is based addresses this conflict by recording the voice of the Konda Reddis, an indigenous group, through video for development communication. The video recorded peoples’ responses periodically to the key question, ‘is life in the hills or in the resettlement colony better, and why?’ Playing back these videos to the different respondents, including officials responsible for the development programme, in between responses was attempted to help them reflect on what they had said earlier in relation to what others had said, allowing room for them to reflect and respond again. The camera and video recording became the medium of real space and time, bringing the Konda Reddis, development agents and the anthropologist in conversation with each other.","PeriodicalId":198822,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Anthropological Survey of India","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Anthropological Survey of India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2277436X211028973","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The relation between indigenous people and development agencies is much discussed in anthropology (Bicker et al., 2004; Pottier et al., 2003; Sillitoe et al., 2002). This relation is more often than not, one of conflict. A conflict that builds from distrust by the people on the development agent and disrespect from the latter on the former. The research on which this article is based addresses this conflict by recording the voice of the Konda Reddis, an indigenous group, through video for development communication. The video recorded peoples’ responses periodically to the key question, ‘is life in the hills or in the resettlement colony better, and why?’ Playing back these videos to the different respondents, including officials responsible for the development programme, in between responses was attempted to help them reflect on what they had said earlier in relation to what others had said, allowing room for them to reflect and respond again. The camera and video recording became the medium of real space and time, bringing the Konda Reddis, development agents and the anthropologist in conversation with each other.
参与发展中的视频大篷车:反身性,代理和桥梁沟通
在人类学中,土著居民与发展机构之间的关系被广泛讨论(Bicker et al., 2004;Pottier et al., 2003;silitoe et al., 2002)。这种关系往往是一种冲突。这种冲突源于人们对发展代理人的不信任和后者对前者的不尊重。这篇文章所基于的研究,通过发展传播视频记录了Konda Reddis(一个土著群体)的声音,解决了这一冲突。这段视频定期记录了人们对一个关键问题的回答,这个问题是:“住在山区还是在移民聚居区的生活更好?为什么?”“将这些视频播放给不同的受访者,包括负责开发项目的官员,在他们的回答之间,试图帮助他们反思自己之前所说的话,并将其与他人所说的话联系起来,给他们反思和再次回答的空间。”相机和视频记录成为了真实空间和时间的媒介,将Konda redis、开发代理人和人类学家带到彼此的对话中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信