Optimal multi-path routing and bandwidth allocation under utility max-min fairness

J. Chou, Bill Lin
{"title":"Optimal multi-path routing and bandwidth allocation under utility max-min fairness","authors":"J. Chou, Bill Lin","doi":"10.1109/IWQoS.2009.5201396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An important goal of bandwidth allocation is to maximize the utilization of network resources while sharing the resources in a fair manner among network flows. To strike a balance between fairness and throughput, a widely studied criterion in the network community is the notion of max-min fairness. However, the majority of work on max-min fairness has been limited to the case where the routing of flows has already been defined and this routing is usually based on a single fixed routing path for each flow. In this paper, we consider the more general problem in which the routing of flows, possibly over multiple paths per flow, is an optimization parameter in the bandwidth allocation problem. Our goal is to determine a routing assignment for each flow so that the bandwidth allocation achieves optimal utility max-min fairness with respect to all feasible routings of flows. We present evaluations of our proposed multi-path utility max-min fair allocation algorithms on a statistical traffic engineering application to show that significantly higher minimum utility can be achieved when multi-path routing is considered simultaneously with bandwidth allocation under utility max-min fairness, and this higher minimum utility corresponds to significant application performance improvements.","PeriodicalId":231103,"journal":{"name":"2009 17th International Workshop on Quality of Service","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 17th International Workshop on Quality of Service","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IWQoS.2009.5201396","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

An important goal of bandwidth allocation is to maximize the utilization of network resources while sharing the resources in a fair manner among network flows. To strike a balance between fairness and throughput, a widely studied criterion in the network community is the notion of max-min fairness. However, the majority of work on max-min fairness has been limited to the case where the routing of flows has already been defined and this routing is usually based on a single fixed routing path for each flow. In this paper, we consider the more general problem in which the routing of flows, possibly over multiple paths per flow, is an optimization parameter in the bandwidth allocation problem. Our goal is to determine a routing assignment for each flow so that the bandwidth allocation achieves optimal utility max-min fairness with respect to all feasible routings of flows. We present evaluations of our proposed multi-path utility max-min fair allocation algorithms on a statistical traffic engineering application to show that significantly higher minimum utility can be achieved when multi-path routing is considered simultaneously with bandwidth allocation under utility max-min fairness, and this higher minimum utility corresponds to significant application performance improvements.
效用最大最小公平性下的最优多路径路由和带宽分配
带宽分配的一个重要目标是最大限度地利用网络资源,同时在网络流之间公平地共享资源。为了在公平性和吞吐量之间取得平衡,网络社区广泛研究的一个标准是最大最小公平性的概念。然而,大多数关于最大最小公平性的工作仅限于流的路由已经定义的情况,并且这种路由通常基于每个流的单个固定路由路径。在本文中,我们考虑了一个更一般的问题,其中流的路由,可能有多条路径,是带宽分配问题中的一个优化参数。我们的目标是确定每个流的路由分配,使带宽分配相对于所有可行的流路由达到最优效用最大最小公平性。我们在一个统计流量工程应用中对我们提出的多路径效用最大-最小公平分配算法进行了评估,结果表明,当在效用最大-最小公平下同时考虑多路径路由和带宽分配时,可以实现显著更高的最小效用,而这种更高的最小效用对应于显著的应用性能改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信