“A Libament to Your Palate”: Narrative Form, History and Gender in Eliana. A New Romance

M. Tomás
{"title":"“A Libament to Your Palate”: Narrative Form, History and Gender in Eliana. A New Romance","authors":"M. Tomás","doi":"10.25145/j.recaesin.2019.79.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolEliana. A New Romance (1661), atribuido a Samuel Pordage, no atrajo la atencion de los lectores en el momento de su publicacion y sigue siendo uno de los romances de la Restauracion menos estudiados. En 2007, Amelia Zurcher rescato la obra del olvido al analizar la nocion de ‘interes’ en dos historias del romance, el cual describio como “mucho mas convencional que menos.” A fin de ofrecer una introduccion mas completa y, de camino, sugerir algunos de los elementos “menos convencionales,” este articulo estudiara, entre otros aspectos, las estructuras diegeticas y de lectura, las tecnicas narrativas mas fidedignas y objetivas ideadas tanto para las voces intradiegeticas como para el narrador extradiegetico, la extraordinaria combinacion de ficcion e historia antigua, la variedad de relaciones masculinas dentro del espectro homosocial-homosexual, y la defensa de la amistad como prototipo ideal de amor. Este articulo mostrara algunas estrategias empleadas por el joven Pordage en su intento de actualizar el genero narrativo. EnglishEliana. A New Romance (1661), attributed to Samuel Pordage, not only failed to appeal to its contemporary readership, but also remains one of the most neglected romances of the early Restoration period. In 2007, Amelia Zurcher rescued it from oblivion by exploring the notion of ‘interest’ in two stories within this “more rather than less conventional” romance. In order to introduce it further and, in the process, suggest some of its “less conventional” aspects, this essay will focus, among other issues, on the diegetic and readerly structures, the strategies to reinforce the reliability of both the intradiegetic narrators and the extradiegetic voice, the remarkable combination of fiction and ancient history, the male relationships in the homosocial-homosexual spectrum, and the extolling of friendship as the ideal prototype of love. This essay may ultimately show some of the ways in which young Pordage tried to modernise the art of fiction.","PeriodicalId":273717,"journal":{"name":"Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25145/j.recaesin.2019.79.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

espanolEliana. A New Romance (1661), atribuido a Samuel Pordage, no atrajo la atencion de los lectores en el momento de su publicacion y sigue siendo uno de los romances de la Restauracion menos estudiados. En 2007, Amelia Zurcher rescato la obra del olvido al analizar la nocion de ‘interes’ en dos historias del romance, el cual describio como “mucho mas convencional que menos.” A fin de ofrecer una introduccion mas completa y, de camino, sugerir algunos de los elementos “menos convencionales,” este articulo estudiara, entre otros aspectos, las estructuras diegeticas y de lectura, las tecnicas narrativas mas fidedignas y objetivas ideadas tanto para las voces intradiegeticas como para el narrador extradiegetico, la extraordinaria combinacion de ficcion e historia antigua, la variedad de relaciones masculinas dentro del espectro homosocial-homosexual, y la defensa de la amistad como prototipo ideal de amor. Este articulo mostrara algunas estrategias empleadas por el joven Pordage en su intento de actualizar el genero narrativo. EnglishEliana. A New Romance (1661), attributed to Samuel Pordage, not only failed to appeal to its contemporary readership, but also remains one of the most neglected romances of the early Restoration period. In 2007, Amelia Zurcher rescued it from oblivion by exploring the notion of ‘interest’ in two stories within this “more rather than less conventional” romance. In order to introduce it further and, in the process, suggest some of its “less conventional” aspects, this essay will focus, among other issues, on the diegetic and readerly structures, the strategies to reinforce the reliability of both the intradiegetic narrators and the extradiegetic voice, the remarkable combination of fiction and ancient history, the male relationships in the homosocial-homosexual spectrum, and the extolling of friendship as the ideal prototype of love. This essay may ultimately show some of the ways in which young Pordage tried to modernise the art of fiction.
《献给你味蕾的颂词》:《伊莲娜》的叙事形式、历史和性别。一段新的浪漫
espanolEliana。塞缪尔·波戴奇(Samuel Pordage)的《新罗曼史》(A New Romance, 1661)在出版时并没有引起读者的注意,仍然是修复时期研究最少的罗曼史之一。2007年,阿米莉亚·祖尔彻(Amelia Zurcher)通过分析两个浪漫故事中“兴趣”的危害,拯救了这部作品。她将这两个故事描述为“比其他故事更传统”。为了提供一个更完整的介绍,并在此过程中提出一些“不太传统”的元素,这篇考虑,除其他事项外,阅读diegeticas和结构中,tecnicas narrativas的最可信和客观的为intradiegeticas的声音组合特别解说员extradiegetico、ficcion和古老的历史,品种homosocial-homosexual光谱内男性的关系,并维护友谊原型理想的爱情。在这篇文章中,Pordage提出了一种新的叙事类型,在这种叙事类型中,他的作品被视为一种新的叙事类型。EnglishEliana。新民谣(1661)、撒母耳Pordage attributed to not only failed to上诉法院对当代readership,仍然是one of the most忽视罗曼史of the early Restoration period。In 2007年,阿梅利亚Zurcher rescued it from星际by欧洲促进the notion of‘interest In two " within this more”而不是较常规浪漫。”In order to引入它还and, In the process of its suggest,较常规“aspects, this essay将重点”,其他问题中,on the diegetic and readerly聘用、strategies to阐述可靠性of both the intradiegetic narrators and the extradiegetic voice, the remarkable过分强调小说and ancient history, the男关系In the homosocial-homosexual理想的光谱,and the extolling of友谊as the prototype of love。这篇文章最终展示了一些年轻的Pordage试图使小说艺术现代化的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信