Quantifying Cloud Misbehavior

Abstract

Clouds have gained popularity over the years as they provide on-demand resources without associated long-term costs. Cloud users often gain superuser access to cloud machines, which is necessary to customize them to user needs. But superuser access to a vast amount of resources, without support or oversight of experienced system administrators, can create fertile ground for accidental or intentional misuse. Attackers can rent cloud machines or hijack them from cloud users, and leverage them to generate unwanted traffic, such as spam and phishing, denial of service, vulnerability scans, drive-by downloads, etc. In this paper, we analyze 13 datasets, containing various types of unwanted traffic, to quantify cloud misbehavior and identify clouds that most often and most aggressively generate unwanted traffic. We find that although clouds own only 5.4% of the routable IPv4 address space (with 94.6% going to non-clouds), they often generate similar amounts of scans as non-clouds, and contribute to 22–96% of entries on blocklists. Among /24 prefixes that send vulnerability scans, a cloud's /24 prefix is 20–100 times more aggressive than a non-cloud's. Among /24 prefixes whose addresses appear on blocklists, a cloud's /24 prefix is almost twice as likely to have its address listed, compared to a non-cloud's /24 prefix. Misbehavior is heavy-tailed among both clouds and non-clouds. There are 25 clouds that contribute 90% of all the cloud scans, and 10 clouds contribute more than 20% of blocklist entries from clouds.