Machine Learning-based Sensor Data Forecasting for Precision Evaluation of Environmental Sensing

Arturs Kempelis, Marta Narigina, Eduards Osadcijs, A. Patlins, A. Romānovs
{"title":"Machine Learning-based Sensor Data Forecasting for Precision Evaluation of Environmental Sensing","authors":"Arturs Kempelis, Marta Narigina, Eduards Osadcijs, A. Patlins, A. Romānovs","doi":"10.1109/AIEEE58915.2023.10135031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper considers various models for forecasting environmental sensor data values. The aim is to evaluate and compare the performance of forecasting methods, such as machine learning and neural networks when forecasting CO2, Temperature and Humidity sensor data. The research methodology entails finding and employing widely used algorithms to conduct experiments aimed at forecasting humidity, temperature, and CO2 sensor data. The models Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), and Vector Autoregressive (VAR) model were implemented and used in the experiments. The findings reveal that the LSTM model demonstrates the lengthiest training duration but has consistent performance across all evaluation metrics. In contrast, the VAR model excels in temperature forecasting with reduced training times but exhibits inferior performance in forecasting humidity and CO2 levels. The CNN model, however, consistently underperforms in comparison to the other two models, particularly in humidity and CO2 forecasting. Results show that model selection is contingent upon the specific problem and data characteristics, with LSTMs being more for scenarios with long-range dependencies, and VAR models being advantageous for linear and stable relationships between variables.","PeriodicalId":149255,"journal":{"name":"2023 IEEE 10th Jubilee Workshop on Advances in Information, Electronic and Electrical Engineering (AIEEE)","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 IEEE 10th Jubilee Workshop on Advances in Information, Electronic and Electrical Engineering (AIEEE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AIEEE58915.2023.10135031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper considers various models for forecasting environmental sensor data values. The aim is to evaluate and compare the performance of forecasting methods, such as machine learning and neural networks when forecasting CO2, Temperature and Humidity sensor data. The research methodology entails finding and employing widely used algorithms to conduct experiments aimed at forecasting humidity, temperature, and CO2 sensor data. The models Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), and Vector Autoregressive (VAR) model were implemented and used in the experiments. The findings reveal that the LSTM model demonstrates the lengthiest training duration but has consistent performance across all evaluation metrics. In contrast, the VAR model excels in temperature forecasting with reduced training times but exhibits inferior performance in forecasting humidity and CO2 levels. The CNN model, however, consistently underperforms in comparison to the other two models, particularly in humidity and CO2 forecasting. Results show that model selection is contingent upon the specific problem and data characteristics, with LSTMs being more for scenarios with long-range dependencies, and VAR models being advantageous for linear and stable relationships between variables.
基于机器学习的传感器数据预测用于环境感知的精度评估
本文考虑了各种预测环境传感器数据值的模型。目的是评估和比较预测方法的性能,如机器学习和神经网络在预测二氧化碳、温度和湿度传感器数据时。研究方法需要找到并采用广泛使用的算法来进行旨在预测湿度、温度和二氧化碳传感器数据的实验。实现了长短期记忆(LSTM)模型、卷积神经网络(CNN)模型和向量自回归(VAR)模型。结果表明,LSTM模型具有最长的训练时间,但在所有评估指标上具有一致的性能。相比之下,VAR模型在减少训练时间的情况下,在预测温度方面表现出色,但在预测湿度和二氧化碳水平方面表现较差。然而,与其他两个模型相比,CNN模型一直表现不佳,特别是在湿度和二氧化碳预测方面。结果表明,模型选择取决于具体问题和数据特征,lstm更适用于具有长期依赖关系的场景,VAR模型有利于变量之间的线性和稳定关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信