Ontology for Reactive Techniques in Digital Forensics

Dagney Ellison, R. Ikuesan, H. Venter
{"title":"Ontology for Reactive Techniques in Digital Forensics","authors":"Dagney Ellison, R. Ikuesan, H. Venter","doi":"10.1109/AINS47559.2019.8968696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Techniques applied in response to detrimental digital incidents vary in many respects according to their attributes. Models of techniques exist in current research but are typically restricted to some subset with regards to the discipline of the incident. An enormous collection of techniques is actually available for use. There is no single model representing all these techniques. There is no current categorisation of digital forensics reactive techniques that classify techniques according to the attribute of function and nor is there an attempt to classify techniques in a means that goes beyond a subset. In this paper, an ontology that depicts digital forensic reactive techniques classified by function is presented. The ontology itself contains additional information for each technique useful for merging into a cognate system where the relationship between techniques and other facets of the digital investigative process can be defined. A number of existing techniques were collected and described according to their function – a verb. The function then guided the placement and classification of the techniques in the ontology according to the ontology development process. The ontology contributes to a knowledge base for digital forensics – essentially useful as a resource for the various people operating in the field of digital forensics. The benefit of this that the information can be queried, assumptions can be made explicit, and there is a one-stop-shop for digital forensics reactive techniques with their place in the investigation detailed.","PeriodicalId":309381,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE Conference on Application, Information and Network Security (AINS)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE Conference on Application, Information and Network Security (AINS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AINS47559.2019.8968696","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Techniques applied in response to detrimental digital incidents vary in many respects according to their attributes. Models of techniques exist in current research but are typically restricted to some subset with regards to the discipline of the incident. An enormous collection of techniques is actually available for use. There is no single model representing all these techniques. There is no current categorisation of digital forensics reactive techniques that classify techniques according to the attribute of function and nor is there an attempt to classify techniques in a means that goes beyond a subset. In this paper, an ontology that depicts digital forensic reactive techniques classified by function is presented. The ontology itself contains additional information for each technique useful for merging into a cognate system where the relationship between techniques and other facets of the digital investigative process can be defined. A number of existing techniques were collected and described according to their function – a verb. The function then guided the placement and classification of the techniques in the ontology according to the ontology development process. The ontology contributes to a knowledge base for digital forensics – essentially useful as a resource for the various people operating in the field of digital forensics. The benefit of this that the information can be queried, assumptions can be made explicit, and there is a one-stop-shop for digital forensics reactive techniques with their place in the investigation detailed.
数字取证中反应技术的本体
用于应对有害数字事件的技术根据其属性在许多方面有所不同。目前的研究中存在技术模型,但通常限于事件学科的某个子集。实际上有大量的技术可供使用。没有一个单一的模型可以代表所有这些技术。目前没有根据功能属性对技术进行分类的数字取证反应技术的分类,也没有尝试以超出子集的方式对技术进行分类。本文提出了一个按功能分类的数字取证反应技术本体。本体本身包含了用于合并到同源系统的每种技术的附加信息,在同源系统中可以定义技术与数字调查过程的其他方面之间的关系。收集了许多现有的技术,并根据它们的功能(动词)进行了描述。然后根据本体的开发过程指导技术在本体中的位置和分类。本体论为数字取证提供了知识库——对于在数字取证领域工作的各种人员来说,本体论基本上是一种有用的资源。这样做的好处是可以查询信息,可以明确假设,并且可以为数字取证反应技术提供一站式服务,并详细说明其在调查中的位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信