Architecture Reconstruction and Analysis of Medical Device Software

D. Ganesan, M. Lindvall, R. Cleaveland, R. Jetley, P. Jones, Y. Zhang
{"title":"Architecture Reconstruction and Analysis of Medical Device Software","authors":"D. Ganesan, M. Lindvall, R. Cleaveland, R. Jetley, P. Jones, Y. Zhang","doi":"10.1109/WICSA.2011.33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"New research is underway at the FDA to investigate the benefits of integrating architecture analysis into safety evaluations of medical-device software. Due to the complexity in setting up testing environments for such software, the FDA is unable to conduct large-scale safety testing, instead, it must rely on other techniques to build an argument for whether the software is safe or not. The architecture analysis approach, formalized using relational algebra, is based on reconstructing abstract, yet precise, architectural views from source code to help build such arguments about safety. This paper discusses the use of the formal approach to analyze the Computer-Assisted Resuscitation Algorithm (CARA) software, which controls an infusion pump designed to provide automated assistance for transfusing blood. The results suggest that a) architecture analysis offers many insights related to software quality in general and testability (i.e., the ease of testing) and its impact on safety in particular, and b) architectural analysis results can be used to help configure static analysis tools to improve their performance for verifying safety properties.","PeriodicalId":234615,"journal":{"name":"2011 Ninth Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 Ninth Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WICSA.2011.33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

New research is underway at the FDA to investigate the benefits of integrating architecture analysis into safety evaluations of medical-device software. Due to the complexity in setting up testing environments for such software, the FDA is unable to conduct large-scale safety testing, instead, it must rely on other techniques to build an argument for whether the software is safe or not. The architecture analysis approach, formalized using relational algebra, is based on reconstructing abstract, yet precise, architectural views from source code to help build such arguments about safety. This paper discusses the use of the formal approach to analyze the Computer-Assisted Resuscitation Algorithm (CARA) software, which controls an infusion pump designed to provide automated assistance for transfusing blood. The results suggest that a) architecture analysis offers many insights related to software quality in general and testability (i.e., the ease of testing) and its impact on safety in particular, and b) architectural analysis results can be used to help configure static analysis tools to improve their performance for verifying safety properties.
医疗器械软件体系结构重构与分析
FDA正在进行一项新的研究,以调查将架构分析整合到医疗设备软件的安全评估中的好处。由于为此类软件设置测试环境的复杂性,FDA无法进行大规模的安全测试,相反,它必须依靠其他技术来建立软件是否安全的论据。使用关系代数形式化的体系结构分析方法基于重构源代码中的抽象但精确的体系结构视图,以帮助构建有关安全性的论证。本文讨论了使用形式化方法来分析计算机辅助复苏算法(CARA)软件,该软件控制输液泵,旨在为输血提供自动辅助。结果表明,a)体系结构分析提供了许多与软件质量和可测试性(即,测试的便捷性)及其对安全性的影响相关的见解,b)体系结构分析结果可用于帮助配置静态分析工具,以改进其验证安全属性的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信