Fundamentals of innovation in chemical engineering

N. Kystaubayeva, R. Sharipov, M. T. Gabdullin, B. Utelbayev, E. Suleimenov
{"title":"Fundamentals of innovation in chemical engineering","authors":"N. Kystaubayeva, R. Sharipov, M. T. Gabdullin, B. Utelbayev, E. Suleimenov","doi":"10.1145/3330431.3330467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In his work, M. Faraday noted that in all physical and chemical processes there is an analogy of energy phenomena (heat exchange and electric current between material objects, combustion, phase transitions, etc.).). For example, in the history of chemistry there was a theory of heat transfer from one material object to another with the help of some liquid, which was called \"heat\" or \"phlogiston\". Under phlogiston means hypothetical \"ultra-thin substance\", allegedly filling all combustible substances and released from them during combustion. Phlogiston was presented as a weightless liquid, evaporate substances during combustion. Some experiments with heated bodies to some extent were so well described in the framework of this\" phlogiston theory\" that it was even possible to predict the results of the process, if the initial conditions were known. The reason for the rejection of these views were experiments in which it was found that the \"amount of heat\" is not saved. That is, performing work, external forces can produce \"heat\" in arbitrary quantities. In the 1770s, the theory of \"heat\" was refuted by the work of Antoine Lavoisier. However, speaking of the theory of phlogiston, Soddy said: \"the spirit of chemistry pushed her to pure materialism. Later, the defenders of the theory of phlogiston made a fatal mistake, materializing it. With the ascension of the Scales and weighing as a criterion of material existence, phlogiston, as a material substance, was rejected, and the theory itself fell into a completely undeserved disgrace. In this paper, there are very remarkable circumstances: the heat carrier as a material substance was rejected with the addition of the science of Weights and weighing - in other words, an attempt was made to put an experiment to determine the weight of \"caloric content\"; when mixing water, it was believed that it does not undergo any physical changes, since it was dominated by the theory of Arrhenius and the structure of water was considered continuous. We have clearly shown that the structure of water has a molecular structure, those when the water is shaken, the triboelectric effects come to the fore, which cause a change in water temperature when shaken. And the value of triboelectric effects depends on the\"spent\"...power or energy.\"The use of the postulates of M. Faraday, the classical equations of thermodynamics, the works of D. Mendeleev and other classics of science allows us to improve the theoretical foundations of chemical engineering.","PeriodicalId":196960,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Engineering and MIS","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Engineering and MIS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3330431.3330467","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In his work, M. Faraday noted that in all physical and chemical processes there is an analogy of energy phenomena (heat exchange and electric current between material objects, combustion, phase transitions, etc.).). For example, in the history of chemistry there was a theory of heat transfer from one material object to another with the help of some liquid, which was called "heat" or "phlogiston". Under phlogiston means hypothetical "ultra-thin substance", allegedly filling all combustible substances and released from them during combustion. Phlogiston was presented as a weightless liquid, evaporate substances during combustion. Some experiments with heated bodies to some extent were so well described in the framework of this" phlogiston theory" that it was even possible to predict the results of the process, if the initial conditions were known. The reason for the rejection of these views were experiments in which it was found that the "amount of heat" is not saved. That is, performing work, external forces can produce "heat" in arbitrary quantities. In the 1770s, the theory of "heat" was refuted by the work of Antoine Lavoisier. However, speaking of the theory of phlogiston, Soddy said: "the spirit of chemistry pushed her to pure materialism. Later, the defenders of the theory of phlogiston made a fatal mistake, materializing it. With the ascension of the Scales and weighing as a criterion of material existence, phlogiston, as a material substance, was rejected, and the theory itself fell into a completely undeserved disgrace. In this paper, there are very remarkable circumstances: the heat carrier as a material substance was rejected with the addition of the science of Weights and weighing - in other words, an attempt was made to put an experiment to determine the weight of "caloric content"; when mixing water, it was believed that it does not undergo any physical changes, since it was dominated by the theory of Arrhenius and the structure of water was considered continuous. We have clearly shown that the structure of water has a molecular structure, those when the water is shaken, the triboelectric effects come to the fore, which cause a change in water temperature when shaken. And the value of triboelectric effects depends on the"spent"...power or energy."The use of the postulates of M. Faraday, the classical equations of thermodynamics, the works of D. Mendeleev and other classics of science allows us to improve the theoretical foundations of chemical engineering.
化学工程创新基础
法拉第先生在他的著作中指出,在所有的物理和化学过程中,都存在着能量现象的类比(物体之间的热交换和电流、燃烧、相变等)。例如,在化学的历史上,有一种理论是关于在某种液体的帮助下热量从一种物质传递到另一种物质的,这种理论被称为“热”或“燃素”。燃素是指假想的“超薄物质”,据称它填充了所有可燃物质,并在燃烧过程中从中释放出来。燃素是一种失重液体,在燃烧过程中挥发的物质。在这种“燃素理论”的框架下,某些加热物体的实验在某种程度上得到了很好的描述,如果知道初始条件,甚至可以预测过程的结果。拒绝这些观点的原因是在实验中发现“热量”没有被保存。也就是说,在做功时,外力可以产生任意数量的“热”。在18世纪70年代,“热”理论被安托万·拉瓦锡的著作所驳斥。然而,谈到燃素理论,索迪说:“化学精神把她推向了纯粹的唯物主义。后来,燃素理论的捍卫者犯了一个致命的错误,把它具体化了。随着天平的提升和称重作为物质存在的标准,燃素作为一种物质实体被拒绝了,理论本身陷入了完全不应该的耻辱。在本文中,有一个非常值得注意的情况:热载体作为一种物质物质被抛弃了,加入了重量学和称量学——换句话说,试图进行一个实验来确定重量的“热量含量”;当混合水时,人们认为它不会发生任何物理变化,因为它以阿伦尼乌斯的理论为主导,并且认为水的结构是连续的。我们已经清楚地表明,水的结构具有分子结构,当水被摇动时,摩擦电效应就会显现出来,当水被摇动时,摩擦电效应会引起水温的变化。摩擦电效应的值取决于“消耗”…能量或能量“法拉第的公设、经典的热力学方程、门捷列夫的著作和其他科学经典的应用,使我们能够改进化学工程的理论基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信