Teacher Agency in the Context of Curriculum Reform: An International Scoping Review

H. Dinh
{"title":"Teacher Agency in the Context of Curriculum Reform: An International Scoping Review","authors":"H. Dinh","doi":"10.22492/issn.2188-1162.2022.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In parallel with neoliberal curriculum reforms taking place over the globe, teacher agency is increasingly recognized as a worthwhile research topic. Although the concept of teacher agency is fast becoming an educationally worldwide concern, there is little agreement on its conceptualization. Additionally, despite its real significance to educational changes, no previous study has attempted to collate international evidence on teacher agency enactment and how to support such agency in large-scale K-12 curriculum reforms. Therefore, this scoping review aims to: (1) clarify how teacher agency has been conceptualized in relation to curriculum reform; (2) uncover teacher’s experience of agency in government-initiated reforms; (3) identify factors that possibly influence teacher agency. Following the procedure recommended by Arksey and O'Malley (2005), the author finally selected 10 empirical studies published in peer-reviewed Scopus indexed journals that met the inclusion criteria. Findings reveal that varied concepts and frameworks have been adopted to capture the complexity of teacher agency as it relates to system-wide curriculum reforms. It is also found that teachers in reviewed studies largely experienced tension and demonstrated different levels of agency across curriculum reform contexts. As emerging from the literature, their enactment of agency was supposedly impacted by personal, structural and cultural conditions. Whereas strong professional belief and collaborative school culture were the most likely to enable agency, contradictions between tools of the new curriculum and teacher’s experiences and beliefs seemed to considerably constrain it. Implications for researchers, policy makers, school leaders and teacher trainers are discussed.","PeriodicalId":413479,"journal":{"name":"ECE Official Conference Proceedings","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ECE Official Conference Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22492/issn.2188-1162.2022.18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In parallel with neoliberal curriculum reforms taking place over the globe, teacher agency is increasingly recognized as a worthwhile research topic. Although the concept of teacher agency is fast becoming an educationally worldwide concern, there is little agreement on its conceptualization. Additionally, despite its real significance to educational changes, no previous study has attempted to collate international evidence on teacher agency enactment and how to support such agency in large-scale K-12 curriculum reforms. Therefore, this scoping review aims to: (1) clarify how teacher agency has been conceptualized in relation to curriculum reform; (2) uncover teacher’s experience of agency in government-initiated reforms; (3) identify factors that possibly influence teacher agency. Following the procedure recommended by Arksey and O'Malley (2005), the author finally selected 10 empirical studies published in peer-reviewed Scopus indexed journals that met the inclusion criteria. Findings reveal that varied concepts and frameworks have been adopted to capture the complexity of teacher agency as it relates to system-wide curriculum reforms. It is also found that teachers in reviewed studies largely experienced tension and demonstrated different levels of agency across curriculum reform contexts. As emerging from the literature, their enactment of agency was supposedly impacted by personal, structural and cultural conditions. Whereas strong professional belief and collaborative school culture were the most likely to enable agency, contradictions between tools of the new curriculum and teacher’s experiences and beliefs seemed to considerably constrain it. Implications for researchers, policy makers, school leaders and teacher trainers are discussed.
课程改革背景下的教师代理:一项国际范围评估
随着新自由主义课程改革在全球范围内的开展,教师代理越来越被认为是一个值得研究的课题。尽管教师代理的概念正迅速成为教育界关注的一个问题,但对其概念的界定却鲜有定论。此外,尽管它对教育变革具有真正的意义,但之前没有研究试图整理关于教师代理制定以及如何在大规模K-12课程改革中支持这种代理的国际证据。因此,本研究旨在:(1)厘清教师代理在课程改革中的概念;(2)揭示教师在政府改革中的代理经验;(3)识别可能影响教师代理的因素。按照Arksey和O'Malley(2005)推荐的程序,作者最终选择了10篇发表在同行评议的Scopus索引期刊上的符合纳入标准的实证研究。调查结果表明,在涉及全系统课程改革时,采用了不同的概念和框架来捕捉教师代理的复杂性。研究还发现,在回顾研究中,教师在课程改革背景下大部分经历紧张,并表现出不同程度的代理。从文献中浮现出来的是,他们的能动性被认为受到个人、结构和文化条件的影响。虽然强烈的专业信念和合作的学校文化最有可能促成代理,但新课程工具与教师经验和信念之间的矛盾似乎在很大程度上限制了代理。对研究人员、政策制定者、学校领导和教师培训人员的影响进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书