Grassroots accountability: the practical and symbolic aspects of performance

John Millar, F. Mueller, Chris Carter
{"title":"Grassroots accountability: the practical and symbolic aspects of performance","authors":"John Millar, F. Mueller, Chris Carter","doi":"10.1108/aaaj-06-2022-5865","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe paper provides a theoretical framework for interdisciplinary accounting scholars interested in performances of accountability in front of live audiences.Design/methodology/approachThis is a processual case study of “Falkirk in crisis” that covers the period from September 2021 to September 2022. The focus of this paper is two-fan-Q&A sessions held in October 2021 and June 2022. Both are naturally occurring discussions between two groups such as are found in previous research on routine events and accountability. This is a theoretically consequential case study.FindingsA key insight of the paper is to identify the practical and symbolic dimensions of accountability. The paper demonstrates the need to align these two dimensions when responding to questions: a practical question demands a practical answer and a symbolic question requires a symbolic answer. Second, the paper argues that most fields contain conflicting logics and highlights that a complete performance of accountability needs to cover the different conflicting logics within the field. In this case, this means paying full attention to both the communitarian and results logics. A third finding is that a performance of accountability cannot succeed if the audience rejects attempts to impose an unpalatable definition of the situation. If these three conditions are not met, the performance is bound to fail.Research limitations/implicationsAn important theoretical coontribution of the study is the application of Jeffery Alexander’s work on political performance to public performances of accountability.Practical implicationsThe phenomenon explored in the paper (what the authors term “grassroots accountability”) has broad applicability to any situation in organizational or civic life where the power apex of an organization is required to engage with a group of informed and committed stakeholders – the “community”. For those who find themselves in the position of the fans in this study, the observations set out in the empirical narrative can serve as a useful practical guide. Attempts to answer a practical complaint with a symbolic answer (or vice versa) should be challenged as evasive.Social implicationsThis paper studies an engagement of elite actors with ordinary (or grassroots) actors. The study shows important rules of engagement, including the importance of respecting the power of practical questions and the need to engage with these questions appropriately.Originality/valueThis paper offers a new vista for interdisciplinary accounting by synthesizing the accountability literature with the political performance literature. Specifically, the paper employs Jeffery Alexander’s work on practical and symbolic performance to study the microprocesses underpinning successful and unsuccessful performances of accountability.","PeriodicalId":132341,"journal":{"name":"Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/aaaj-06-2022-5865","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

PurposeThe paper provides a theoretical framework for interdisciplinary accounting scholars interested in performances of accountability in front of live audiences.Design/methodology/approachThis is a processual case study of “Falkirk in crisis” that covers the period from September 2021 to September 2022. The focus of this paper is two-fan-Q&A sessions held in October 2021 and June 2022. Both are naturally occurring discussions between two groups such as are found in previous research on routine events and accountability. This is a theoretically consequential case study.FindingsA key insight of the paper is to identify the practical and symbolic dimensions of accountability. The paper demonstrates the need to align these two dimensions when responding to questions: a practical question demands a practical answer and a symbolic question requires a symbolic answer. Second, the paper argues that most fields contain conflicting logics and highlights that a complete performance of accountability needs to cover the different conflicting logics within the field. In this case, this means paying full attention to both the communitarian and results logics. A third finding is that a performance of accountability cannot succeed if the audience rejects attempts to impose an unpalatable definition of the situation. If these three conditions are not met, the performance is bound to fail.Research limitations/implicationsAn important theoretical coontribution of the study is the application of Jeffery Alexander’s work on political performance to public performances of accountability.Practical implicationsThe phenomenon explored in the paper (what the authors term “grassroots accountability”) has broad applicability to any situation in organizational or civic life where the power apex of an organization is required to engage with a group of informed and committed stakeholders – the “community”. For those who find themselves in the position of the fans in this study, the observations set out in the empirical narrative can serve as a useful practical guide. Attempts to answer a practical complaint with a symbolic answer (or vice versa) should be challenged as evasive.Social implicationsThis paper studies an engagement of elite actors with ordinary (or grassroots) actors. The study shows important rules of engagement, including the importance of respecting the power of practical questions and the need to engage with these questions appropriately.Originality/valueThis paper offers a new vista for interdisciplinary accounting by synthesizing the accountability literature with the political performance literature. Specifically, the paper employs Jeffery Alexander’s work on practical and symbolic performance to study the microprocesses underpinning successful and unsuccessful performances of accountability.
基层问责:绩效的实际和象征性方面
目的:本文为跨学科会计学者在现场观众面前的问责表现感兴趣提供了一个理论框架。这是一个关于“危机中的福尔柯克”的过程案例研究,涵盖了从2021年9月到2022年9月的时间。本文的重点是在2021年10月和2022年6月举行的两场粉丝问答会议。两者都是两个群体之间自然发生的讨论,就像之前对日常事件和问责制的研究中发现的那样。这是一个理论上重要的案例研究。本文的一个关键观点是确定问责制的实际和象征性维度。本文展示了在回答问题时需要将这两个维度结合起来:一个实际问题需要一个实际的答案,一个象征性的问题需要一个象征性的答案。其次,本文认为大多数领域都包含冲突逻辑,并强调问责制的完整表现需要涵盖领域内不同的冲突逻辑。在这种情况下,这意味着要充分关注社区逻辑和结果逻辑。第三个发现是,如果听众拒绝强加一个令人不快的情况定义,问责的表现就不可能成功。如果不满足这三个条件,性能必然会失败。本研究的一个重要理论贡献是将杰弗里·亚历山大关于政治绩效的研究应用于问责制的公共绩效。本文探讨的现象(作者称之为“基层问责制”)广泛适用于组织或公民生活中的任何情况,在这些情况下,组织的权力最高层需要与一群知情且忠诚的利益相关者——“社区”——进行接触。对于那些在本研究中发现自己处于粉丝位置的人来说,实证叙述中提出的观察结果可以作为有用的实践指南。试图用一个象征性的答案来回答一个实际的抱怨(反之亦然)应该被质疑为逃避。社会意义本文研究了精英演员与普通(或草根)演员的互动。这项研究显示了参与的重要规则,包括尊重实际问题的力量的重要性,以及适当参与这些问题的必要性。原创性/价值本文通过对问责文献与政治绩效文献的综合,为跨学科会计提供了新的前景。具体而言,本文采用杰弗里·亚历山大关于实际和象征性绩效的工作来研究支撑问责制成功和不成功绩效的微过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信