Giving Anergy a Value by the Application of an Anergy-exergy Cost Ratio in Thermo-economic Analysis of Systems that Make Thermal Energy Available

L. Meyer, I. Stadler
{"title":"Giving Anergy a Value by the Application of an Anergy-exergy Cost Ratio in Thermo-economic Analysis of Systems that Make Thermal Energy Available","authors":"L. Meyer, I. Stadler","doi":"10.2991/ahe.k.220301.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Techno-economic analysis that allocate costs to the energy flows of energy systems are helpful to understand the formation of costs within processes and to increase the cost efficiency. For the economic evaluation, the usefulness or quality of the energy is of great importance. In exergy-based methods, this is considered by allocating costs to the exergy instead of energy. As exergy represents the ability of performing work, it is often named the useful part of energy. In contrast, the anergy, the part of energy, which cannot perform work, is often assumed to be not useful. However, heat flows as used e.g. in domestic heating are always a mixture of a relative small portion of exergy and a big portion of anergy. Although of lower quality, the anergy is obviously useful for these applications. The question is, whether it makes sense to differentiate between exergy and anergy and take both properties into account for the economic evaluation. To answer this question, a new methodical concept based on the definition of an anergy-exergy cost ratio is compared to the commonly applied approaches of considering either energy or exergy as the basis for economic evaluation. These three different approaches for the economic analysis of thermal energy systems are applied to an exemplary heating system with thermal storages. It is shown that the results of the technoeconomic analysis can be improved by giving anergy an economic value and that the proposed anergy-cost ratio allows a flexible adaptation of the evaluation depending on the economic constraints of a system.","PeriodicalId":177278,"journal":{"name":"Atlantis Highlights in Engineering","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atlantis Highlights in Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/ahe.k.220301.017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Techno-economic analysis that allocate costs to the energy flows of energy systems are helpful to understand the formation of costs within processes and to increase the cost efficiency. For the economic evaluation, the usefulness or quality of the energy is of great importance. In exergy-based methods, this is considered by allocating costs to the exergy instead of energy. As exergy represents the ability of performing work, it is often named the useful part of energy. In contrast, the anergy, the part of energy, which cannot perform work, is often assumed to be not useful. However, heat flows as used e.g. in domestic heating are always a mixture of a relative small portion of exergy and a big portion of anergy. Although of lower quality, the anergy is obviously useful for these applications. The question is, whether it makes sense to differentiate between exergy and anergy and take both properties into account for the economic evaluation. To answer this question, a new methodical concept based on the definition of an anergy-exergy cost ratio is compared to the commonly applied approaches of considering either energy or exergy as the basis for economic evaluation. These three different approaches for the economic analysis of thermal energy systems are applied to an exemplary heating system with thermal storages. It is shown that the results of the technoeconomic analysis can be improved by giving anergy an economic value and that the proposed anergy-cost ratio allows a flexible adaptation of the evaluation depending on the economic constraints of a system.
在热经济分析中应用能能-用能成本比给能一个值
将成本分配到能源系统的能量流的技术经济分析有助于理解过程中成本的形成并提高成本效率。在经济评价中,能源的可用性或质量是非常重要的。在基于火用的方法中,这是通过将成本分配给火用而不是能量来考虑的。由于能表示做功的能力,所以常被称为能的有用部分。相反,能量,不能做功的那部分能量,通常被认为是无用的。然而,例如在家庭供暖中使用的热流总是一小部分能量和很大一部分能量的混合物。虽然质量较低,但对于这些应用来说,能量显然是有用的。问题是,区分能源和能量,并在经济评估中考虑两者的性质是否有意义。为了回答这个问题,本文将基于能用成本比定义的一种新的方法概念与将能量或火用作为经济评价基础的常用方法进行比较。这三种不同的方法为热能系统的经济分析被应用到一个示范性的加热系统与蓄热。结果表明,技术经济分析的结果可以通过赋予能源一个经济价值而得到改善,并且所提出的能源成本比允许根据系统的经济约束灵活地调整评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信