Extension of the Reed-Mallett-Brennan loss for application to stap with collected data

C. M. Teixeira
{"title":"Extension of the Reed-Mallett-Brennan loss for application to stap with collected data","authors":"C. M. Teixeira","doi":"10.1109/ACSSC.2008.5074712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The post-processed signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) has emerged as a critical performance metric in the assessment of space-time adaptive processing (STAP) as applied to radar data collected from multidimensional arrays. In their seminal analysis, Reed, Mallett and Brennan analytically characterized the loss in SINR (ldquoRMB lossrdquo) realized due to the use of an estimate of the interference environment with a finite set of samples relative to the exact result under certain conditions. While providing several well-known ldquorules-of-thumbrdquo that allows the RMB loss to be incorporated into system level analysis, this original formulation can not generally be directly applied to collected radar data since it assumes knowledge of the exact interference covariance which typically is not available. In this paper, the RMB loss is extended to the practical situation where the exact covariance is not available, as with collected radar data. As a consequence, both the adaptive weight and residual interference-plus-noise power must be estimated in computing SINR. Three new approaches for accomplishing this are analyzed and compared in terms of their theoretically derived probability distribution functions, means and variances relative to each other as well as the original RMB loss result. The developed theory is extensively verified with simulation results. A key result is the need for two independent sets of training data to accurately compute the SINR when sample support is limited. New rules-of-thumb are suggested for the amount of training data needed from these two sets of data (i.e. two groups of local range data) to achieve an accurate assessment of SINR loss. This work provides new analytical tools that can be used to better understand the true SINR loss performance of STAP with collected radar data.","PeriodicalId":416114,"journal":{"name":"2008 42nd Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers","volume":"96 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 42nd Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ACSSC.2008.5074712","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The post-processed signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) has emerged as a critical performance metric in the assessment of space-time adaptive processing (STAP) as applied to radar data collected from multidimensional arrays. In their seminal analysis, Reed, Mallett and Brennan analytically characterized the loss in SINR (ldquoRMB lossrdquo) realized due to the use of an estimate of the interference environment with a finite set of samples relative to the exact result under certain conditions. While providing several well-known ldquorules-of-thumbrdquo that allows the RMB loss to be incorporated into system level analysis, this original formulation can not generally be directly applied to collected radar data since it assumes knowledge of the exact interference covariance which typically is not available. In this paper, the RMB loss is extended to the practical situation where the exact covariance is not available, as with collected radar data. As a consequence, both the adaptive weight and residual interference-plus-noise power must be estimated in computing SINR. Three new approaches for accomplishing this are analyzed and compared in terms of their theoretically derived probability distribution functions, means and variances relative to each other as well as the original RMB loss result. The developed theory is extensively verified with simulation results. A key result is the need for two independent sets of training data to accurately compute the SINR when sample support is limited. New rules-of-thumb are suggested for the amount of training data needed from these two sets of data (i.e. two groups of local range data) to achieve an accurate assessment of SINR loss. This work provides new analytical tools that can be used to better understand the true SINR loss performance of STAP with collected radar data.
延长Reed-Mallett-Brennan损失申请与收集的数据同步
后处理的信噪比(SINR)已成为评估从多维阵列收集的雷达数据的时空自适应处理(STAP)的关键性能指标。在他们的开创性分析中,Reed, Mallett和Brennan分析表征了由于使用有限样本集对干扰环境的估计而实现的SINR损失(ldquoRMB损失),相对于特定条件下的确切结果。虽然提供了几个众所周知的经验法则,允许将人民币损失纳入系统级分析,但这种原始公式通常不能直接应用于收集的雷达数据,因为它假设了通常不可用的确切干扰协方差的知识。在本文中,将人民币损失扩展到实际情况下,即无法获得准确的协方差,如收集到的雷达数据。因此,在计算信噪比时,必须同时估计自适应权值和剩余干扰加噪声功率。从理论推导的概率分布函数、相互间的均值和方差以及原有的人民币损失结果等方面,分析比较了三种新的人民币损失方法。所建立的理论得到了仿真结果的广泛验证。一个关键的结果是,当样本支持有限时,需要两组独立的训练数据来准确计算SINR。对于这两组数据(即两组局部范围数据)所需的训练数据量,提出了新的经验法则,以实现对SINR损失的准确评估。这项工作提供了新的分析工具,可用于更好地了解STAP收集的雷达数据的真实SINR损失性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信