Evaluation Of Bitrate Ladders For Versatile Video Coder

Reda Kaafarani, Médéric Blestel, Thomas Maugey, M. Ropert, A. Roumy
{"title":"Evaluation Of Bitrate Ladders For Versatile Video Coder","authors":"Reda Kaafarani, Médéric Blestel, Thomas Maugey, M. Ropert, A. Roumy","doi":"10.1109/VCIP53242.2021.9675425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many video service providers take advantage of bitrate ladders in adaptive HTTP video streaming to account for different network states and user display specifications by providing bitrate/resolution pairs that best fit client's network conditions and display capabilities. These bitrate ladders, however, differ when using different codecs and thus the couples bitrate/resolution differ as well. In addition, bitrate ladders are based on previously available codecs (H.264/MPEG4-AVC, HEVC, etc.), i.e. codecs that are already in service, hence the introduction of new codecs e.g. Versatile Video Coding (VVC) requires re-analyzing these ladders. For that matter, we will analyze the evolution of the bitrate ladder when using VVC. We show how VVC impacts this ladder when compared to HEVC and H.264/AVC and in particular, that there is no need to switch to lower resolutions at the lower bitrates defined in the Call for Evidence on Transcoding for Network Distributed Video Coding (CfE).","PeriodicalId":114062,"journal":{"name":"2021 International Conference on Visual Communications and Image Processing (VCIP)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 International Conference on Visual Communications and Image Processing (VCIP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/VCIP53242.2021.9675425","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Many video service providers take advantage of bitrate ladders in adaptive HTTP video streaming to account for different network states and user display specifications by providing bitrate/resolution pairs that best fit client's network conditions and display capabilities. These bitrate ladders, however, differ when using different codecs and thus the couples bitrate/resolution differ as well. In addition, bitrate ladders are based on previously available codecs (H.264/MPEG4-AVC, HEVC, etc.), i.e. codecs that are already in service, hence the introduction of new codecs e.g. Versatile Video Coding (VVC) requires re-analyzing these ladders. For that matter, we will analyze the evolution of the bitrate ladder when using VVC. We show how VVC impacts this ladder when compared to HEVC and H.264/AVC and in particular, that there is no need to switch to lower resolutions at the lower bitrates defined in the Call for Evidence on Transcoding for Network Distributed Video Coding (CfE).
多用途视频编码器的位率阶梯评价
许多视频服务提供商利用自适应HTTP视频流中的比特率阶梯,通过提供最适合客户端网络条件和显示能力的比特率/分辨率对来考虑不同的网络状态和用户显示规范。然而,当使用不同的编解码器时,这些比特率阶梯是不同的,因此对比特率/分辨率也不同。此外,比特率阶梯是基于先前可用的编解码器(H.264/MPEG4-AVC, HEVC等),即已经在使用的编解码器,因此引入新的编解码器,例如通用视频编码(VVC)需要重新分析这些阶梯。为此,我们将分析使用VVC时比特率阶梯的演变。我们展示了与HEVC和H.264/AVC相比,VVC是如何影响这个阶梯的,特别是,没有必要在网络分布式视频编码转码证据(CfE)中定义的较低比特率下切换到较低的分辨率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信