The legal Consequences of Default of Parties in the Lease Agreement between PT. Kereta Api Indonesia (PT. KAI) with PT. J.Co Donuts & Coffee

Nurma Khafifah, A. Silviana
{"title":"The legal Consequences of Default of Parties in the Lease Agreement between PT. Kereta Api Indonesia (PT. KAI) with PT. J.Co Donuts & Coffee","authors":"Nurma Khafifah, A. Silviana","doi":"10.30659/jdh.v5i3.23918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The development of the rental business can not be denied can experience a problem along with its development, such as the problem of default that occurred between PT. J.Co Donuts & Coffee with PT. Kereta Api Indonesia (Persero). PT. J. Co Donuts & Coffee (the plaintiff) leased assets from PT. Kereta Api Indonesia (defendant) in the form of land and buildings for a period of 5 years. After the defendant made the payment for term I, the defendant did not immediately hand over the object of lease to the plaintiff to be used as a J.Co Donuts & Coffee store so this matter was brought to court. In the decision of the Supreme Court No. 211/K/PDT/2020, the judge decided that PT. KAI has defaulted by not handing over the object of the lease to PT. J.Co Donuts & Coffee. This study aims to determine the form of default and the legal consequences of the default dispute. The method used in this legal research is a normative juridical approach. The specifications used in writing this law are descriptive analytical. While the method used is a qualitative method. The results of the study indicate that the judge has decided on this case correctly, namely that the defendant has defaulted due to an error due to negligence. Furthermore, researchers also examine the legal consequences that arise in the decision of the Supreme Court no. 211/K/PDT/2020.","PeriodicalId":118542,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Daulat Hukum","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Daulat Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30659/jdh.v5i3.23918","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The development of the rental business can not be denied can experience a problem along with its development, such as the problem of default that occurred between PT. J.Co Donuts & Coffee with PT. Kereta Api Indonesia (Persero). PT. J. Co Donuts & Coffee (the plaintiff) leased assets from PT. Kereta Api Indonesia (defendant) in the form of land and buildings for a period of 5 years. After the defendant made the payment for term I, the defendant did not immediately hand over the object of lease to the plaintiff to be used as a J.Co Donuts & Coffee store so this matter was brought to court. In the decision of the Supreme Court No. 211/K/PDT/2020, the judge decided that PT. KAI has defaulted by not handing over the object of the lease to PT. J.Co Donuts & Coffee. This study aims to determine the form of default and the legal consequences of the default dispute. The method used in this legal research is a normative juridical approach. The specifications used in writing this law are descriptive analytical. While the method used is a qualitative method. The results of the study indicate that the judge has decided on this case correctly, namely that the defendant has defaulted due to an error due to negligence. Furthermore, researchers also examine the legal consequences that arise in the decision of the Supreme Court no. 211/K/PDT/2020.
PT. Kereta Api Indonesia (PT. KAI)与PT. J.Co Donuts & Coffee租赁协议中各方违约的法律后果
租赁业务的发展不可否认会在发展过程中遇到问题,例如PT. J.Co Donuts & Coffee与PT. Kereta Api Indonesia (Persero)之间发生的违约问题。j.c o Donuts & Coffee公司(原告)以土地和建筑物的形式从印尼Kereta Api公司(被告)租赁了资产,租期为5年。在被告支付了第一期货款后,被告并没有立即将租赁物移交给原告作为J.Co Donuts & Coffee店铺使用,因此此事被告上法庭。在大法院第211/K/PDT/2020号判决书中,法官判定PT. KAI未将租赁标的移交给PT. J.Co Donuts & Coffee,属于违约行为。本研究旨在确定违约的形式和违约纠纷的法律后果。在这项法律研究中使用的方法是一种规范的司法方法。撰写本法所用的说明是描述性分析性的。而采用的方法是定性方法。研究结果表明,法官对本案的判决是正确的,即被告因过失造成的过失而违约。此外,研究人员还研究了最高法院第1号判决所产生的法律后果。211 / K / PDT / 2020。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信