Encouraging Technology Export through Public Financial Support

{"title":"Encouraging Technology Export through Public Financial Support","authors":"","doi":"10.1163/9789004446090_007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter supplies the second of the two case studies that test out Common Concern inspired trade measures in practice. This study zooms in to the issue of access to finance – one of the key obstacles for the private sector to acquire emission reducing technologies. Within that perimeter, the current chapter focuses on the relationship of potential support measures with the Subsidies Agreement of the wto – especially, the control it would exercise on potential enhancement of such measures. While the argument of boosting climate finance is considered as a virtuous one on the whole, the opaque issue is whether the cause would also justify unregulated public finance of private transactions in lowcarbon technologies (lct), particularly when involving developing country partners. This issue is explored in detail here. The chapter begins with an outline of the need for additional public finance for technology outflows and proposes the enhancement of export promotion support as a positive contributor. The approaches thereof, i.e. supply of financial credit in better terms, or sharing of destinationspecific risks are then examined in the backdrop of the trade regulation – the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (ascm, or the scm agreement), to be specific. Then the lens of Common Concern of Humankind is brought into play to identify areas of further development. The chapter explains that the promotion of clean technology exports and investments could be mutually beneficial for all parties involved. To that effect, the Common Concern doctrine can facilitate an accommodating understanding of the subsidies regulation, as well as indicate the pertinent areas of new rulemaking. This conclusion however remains subject to one important caveat. While markets often lack public support boosting trade or investment flows in the lct s, it may enjoy the same in the sectors that are harmful to the climate. A successful paradigm of financial assistance in the light of resolving the common concern of humankind should also include a parallel focus on the withdrawal of counterproductive supports existing on the market.","PeriodicalId":154957,"journal":{"name":"WTO Law and Trade Policy Reform for Low-Carbon Technology Diffusion","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WTO Law and Trade Policy Reform for Low-Carbon Technology Diffusion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004446090_007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter supplies the second of the two case studies that test out Common Concern inspired trade measures in practice. This study zooms in to the issue of access to finance – one of the key obstacles for the private sector to acquire emission reducing technologies. Within that perimeter, the current chapter focuses on the relationship of potential support measures with the Subsidies Agreement of the wto – especially, the control it would exercise on potential enhancement of such measures. While the argument of boosting climate finance is considered as a virtuous one on the whole, the opaque issue is whether the cause would also justify unregulated public finance of private transactions in lowcarbon technologies (lct), particularly when involving developing country partners. This issue is explored in detail here. The chapter begins with an outline of the need for additional public finance for technology outflows and proposes the enhancement of export promotion support as a positive contributor. The approaches thereof, i.e. supply of financial credit in better terms, or sharing of destinationspecific risks are then examined in the backdrop of the trade regulation – the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (ascm, or the scm agreement), to be specific. Then the lens of Common Concern of Humankind is brought into play to identify areas of further development. The chapter explains that the promotion of clean technology exports and investments could be mutually beneficial for all parties involved. To that effect, the Common Concern doctrine can facilitate an accommodating understanding of the subsidies regulation, as well as indicate the pertinent areas of new rulemaking. This conclusion however remains subject to one important caveat. While markets often lack public support boosting trade or investment flows in the lct s, it may enjoy the same in the sectors that are harmful to the climate. A successful paradigm of financial assistance in the light of resolving the common concern of humankind should also include a parallel focus on the withdrawal of counterproductive supports existing on the market.
通过公共财政支持鼓励技术出口
本章提供了在实践中检验“共同关注”激发的贸易措施的两个案例研究中的第二个。这项研究聚焦于获得资金的问题,这是私营部门获得减排技术的主要障碍之一。在这一范围内,本章的重点是潜在的支助措施与世贸组织《补贴协定》的关系- -特别是对可能加强这种措施的管制。虽然增加气候融资的论点总体上被认为是良性的,但不透明的问题是,这一原因是否也可以证明低碳技术(lct)私人交易中不受监管的公共融资是合理的,尤其是在涉及发展中国家合作伙伴的情况下。这里详细探讨了这个问题。本章首先概述了为技术外流提供额外公共资金的必要性,并建议加强出口促进支助,作为一个积极的贡献。其中的方法,即以更好的条件提供金融信贷,或分担特定目的地的风险,然后在贸易监管的背景下进行审查-具体而言,是《补贴和反补贴措施协定》(ascm,或scm协定)。然后,从人类共同关心的角度出发,确定进一步发展的领域。本章解释说,促进清洁技术出口和投资对所有有关各方都是互利的。为此,共同关切原则可以促进对补贴条例的通便性理解,并指出新规则制定的有关领域。然而,这一结论仍然受到一个重要警告的影响。虽然市场往往缺乏公共支持来促进发达国家的贸易或投资流动,但在对气候有害的部门,市场可能也会得到同样的支持。在解决人类共同关切的情况下,财政援助的成功范例还应包括同时注重撤出市场上现有的适得其反的支助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信