Musisque Deoque: Text Retrieval on Critical Editionse

M. Manca, L. Spinazzè, P. Mastandrea, L. Tessarolo, Federico Boschetti
{"title":"Musisque Deoque: Text Retrieval on Critical Editionse","authors":"M. Manca, L. Spinazzè, P. Mastandrea, L. Tessarolo, Federico Boschetti","doi":"10.21248/jlcl.26.2011.152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Musisque Deoque Project (MQDQ) aims at creating a digital archive of Latin poetry, from its origins to the late Italian Renaissance, equipped with critical apparatus and various exegetical and linguistic information. This project is focused on the study of synchronical and diachronical intertextuality as illustrated, e.g., in Cicu (2005). For this reason, we give strong attention to formal and material aspects of the text that actually played a relevant role in the poetical tradition. The fixed text of printed critical editions, aimed at the reconstruction as close as possible to the lost originals, provides just a snapshot of the tradition, which is intrisically dynamic, and gives to the modern reader a distorted image of what an ancient text was in fact. Fully searchable digital collections currently available are based on traditional critical editions, which are, as we just said, authoritarian texts; this authoritarianism is emphasized by the conversion from printed text to database, because usually the critical apparatus is cut away and there is no way for the reader to check a variant different from the one the editor put in the main text, often dubitanter, simply because he had to choose a variant. Limiting lexical searches to editor’s choices drives unavoidably both to false positives and false negatives, which need to be verified back on printed critical editions. False positives are due to possibly wrong emendations made by modern and contemporary scholars, provided by the text retrieval systems among the genuine occurrences, whereas false negatives are the likely variants excluded by editors biased by prejudices against specific linguistic and stylistic phenomena (such as the short-term repetiton, systematically emended by philologists of the last centuries). The purpose of Musisque Deoque is to overcome these limitations, retrieving not only the word keys quoted in the reference edition, but also the variants lying in the critical apparatus. In this way, further knowledge on the accomplished itinerary – from ancient operas during the subsequent ages until the Humanism and the Renaissance – can emerge.","PeriodicalId":402489,"journal":{"name":"J. Lang. Technol. Comput. Linguistics","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Lang. Technol. Comput. Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21248/jlcl.26.2011.152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The Musisque Deoque Project (MQDQ) aims at creating a digital archive of Latin poetry, from its origins to the late Italian Renaissance, equipped with critical apparatus and various exegetical and linguistic information. This project is focused on the study of synchronical and diachronical intertextuality as illustrated, e.g., in Cicu (2005). For this reason, we give strong attention to formal and material aspects of the text that actually played a relevant role in the poetical tradition. The fixed text of printed critical editions, aimed at the reconstruction as close as possible to the lost originals, provides just a snapshot of the tradition, which is intrisically dynamic, and gives to the modern reader a distorted image of what an ancient text was in fact. Fully searchable digital collections currently available are based on traditional critical editions, which are, as we just said, authoritarian texts; this authoritarianism is emphasized by the conversion from printed text to database, because usually the critical apparatus is cut away and there is no way for the reader to check a variant different from the one the editor put in the main text, often dubitanter, simply because he had to choose a variant. Limiting lexical searches to editor’s choices drives unavoidably both to false positives and false negatives, which need to be verified back on printed critical editions. False positives are due to possibly wrong emendations made by modern and contemporary scholars, provided by the text retrieval systems among the genuine occurrences, whereas false negatives are the likely variants excluded by editors biased by prejudices against specific linguistic and stylistic phenomena (such as the short-term repetiton, systematically emended by philologists of the last centuries). The purpose of Musisque Deoque is to overcome these limitations, retrieving not only the word keys quoted in the reference edition, but also the variants lying in the critical apparatus. In this way, further knowledge on the accomplished itinerary – from ancient operas during the subsequent ages until the Humanism and the Renaissance – can emerge.
德文音乐:关键版的文本检索
Musisque Deoque项目(MQDQ)旨在创建一个拉丁诗歌的数字档案,从它的起源到意大利文艺复兴晚期,配备了批判设备和各种训诂学和语言学信息。本项目重点研究共时性和历时性互文性,如Cicu(2005)所示。出于这个原因,我们非常关注文本的形式和材料方面,它们实际上在诗歌传统中发挥了相关作用。印刷的批评版本的固定文本,旨在尽可能接近于丢失的原件的重建,只是提供了传统的一个快照,它本质上是动态的,给现代读者一个扭曲的形象,什么是古代文本的实际情况。目前可用的完全可搜索的数字馆藏是基于传统的批评版本的,就像我们刚才说的,是权威文本;这种权威主义在从印刷文本到数据库的转换中得到了强调,因为通常关键的工具被删除了读者没有办法检查一个不同于编辑放在主要文本中的变体,通常是怀疑论者,仅仅因为他必须选择一个变体。将词汇搜索限制在编辑的选择范围内,不可避免地会导致假阳性和假阴性,这需要在印刷的关键版本上进行验证。误报是由于现代和当代学者对真实事件中的文本检索系统进行的可能错误的修订,而误报是由于编辑对特定语言和风格现象的偏见而排除的可能的变体(例如短期重复,由上个世纪的语言学家系统地修改)。Musisque Deoque的目的是克服这些限制,不仅检索参考版本中引用的词键,而且检索关键设备中的变体。通过这种方式,可以进一步了解从古代歌剧到后来的时代,直到人文主义和文艺复兴时期的完整旅程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信