The Effectiveness of POGIL on High School Student Chemistry End-of-Course Exams

L. Mata
{"title":"The Effectiveness of POGIL on High School Student Chemistry End-of-Course Exams","authors":"L. Mata","doi":"10.33828/sei.v33.i2.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this quantitative, causal-comparative research study was to determine if and to what extent there were differences in chemistry end-of-course (EOC) exam scores between high school chemistry students taught using POGIL pedagogy and non-POGIL pedagogy in the state of Utah. Piaget’s cognitive development theory and Johnstone’s cognitive load theory served as the theoretical foundations. A large, public school district in the state of Utah provided the de-identified, archival data for this study, which consisted of students that took a chemistry course and chemistry EOC exam in 2015-2016 or 2016-2017. The research question sought to find whether there was a statistically significant difference in chemistry EOC exam scores for high school students in both groups. A one-way ANOVA demonstrated a statistically significant difference between the POGIL and non-POGIL student groups on the dependent variable of chemistry EOC exam scores, F(1, 314) = 29.91, p < .001, partial η2 = .087, (p < .05). This study supported POGIL pedagogy as an effective instructional strategy for improving student chemistry EOC exam scores.","PeriodicalId":156311,"journal":{"name":"Science Education International","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science Education International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v33.i2.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The purpose of this quantitative, causal-comparative research study was to determine if and to what extent there were differences in chemistry end-of-course (EOC) exam scores between high school chemistry students taught using POGIL pedagogy and non-POGIL pedagogy in the state of Utah. Piaget’s cognitive development theory and Johnstone’s cognitive load theory served as the theoretical foundations. A large, public school district in the state of Utah provided the de-identified, archival data for this study, which consisted of students that took a chemistry course and chemistry EOC exam in 2015-2016 or 2016-2017. The research question sought to find whether there was a statistically significant difference in chemistry EOC exam scores for high school students in both groups. A one-way ANOVA demonstrated a statistically significant difference between the POGIL and non-POGIL student groups on the dependent variable of chemistry EOC exam scores, F(1, 314) = 29.91, p < .001, partial η2 = .087, (p < .05). This study supported POGIL pedagogy as an effective instructional strategy for improving student chemistry EOC exam scores.
POGIL在高中生化学期末考试中的效果
本定量、因果比较研究的目的是确定犹他州使用POGIL教学法和非POGIL教学法的高中化学学生在化学期末考试(EOC)成绩上是否存在差异,以及在多大程度上存在差异。皮亚杰的认知发展理论和约翰斯通的认知负荷理论是其理论基础。犹他州的一个大型公立学区为这项研究提供了去识别的档案数据,这些数据由2015-2016年或2016-2017年参加化学课程和化学EOC考试的学生组成。研究问题旨在发现两组高中生化学EOC考试成绩是否存在统计学上的显著差异。单因素方差分析显示,POGIL组与非POGIL组在化学EOC考试成绩的因变量上差异有统计学意义,F(1,314) = 29.91, p < 0.001,偏η2 = 0.087, (p < 0.05)。本研究支持POGIL教学法是提高学生化学EOC考试成绩的有效教学策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信