Effects of cervical excisional procedures for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia on pregnancy and birth: A literature review

R. Hay, J. Patterson
{"title":"Effects of cervical excisional procedures for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia on pregnancy and birth: A literature review","authors":"R. Hay, J. Patterson","doi":"10.12784/nzcomjnl54.2018.3.22-29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A Corresponding Author: rebecca@ osbornehay.co.nz B Liggins Institute, The University of Auckland; Warkworth Birthing Centre; self-employed midwife C Otago Polytechnic, Dunedin Background: Anecdotal evidence suggests midwives recognise that pregnancy and birth may be affected by cervical scarring caused by excisional procedures in the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2 and 3). Affected women seeking information about the effect on their pregnancy and labour must rely on the knowledge of maternity care providers or take guidance from consumer publications. A literature review was undertaken with the objective of exploring pregnancy and birth outcomes following cervical excisional procedures. Method: CINAHL, ProQuest, Pubmed, Google Scholar and Cochrane databases were searched for full text, peer-reviewed articles discussing either original research or systematic reviews, published from 2001-2016. Inclusion criteria were applied and comparative analysis was used to identify and compare outcomes. Findings: Seventeen articles were included for review. Fifteen articles discuss the relationship of cervical excisional procedures to an increased incidence of preterm birth. Other outcomes include the increased incidence of preterm, pre-labour rupture of membranes, or consideration of associated low birthweight related to the method or depth of excision. No articles were found which considered the provision of intrapartum care to women with a history of cervical excision procedures. Conclusion: Current research regarding the effect of cervical excision procedure history on pregnancy and birth is largely limited to quantifying the incidence of preterm birth and preterm, pre-labour rupture of membranes, or in discussing the impact of the method and depth of excision. Research to identify, describe, or best clinically manage the experience of birthing at term with cervical scarring appears to be absent. Further research is needed to extend midwifery knowledge regarding the provision of care during pregnancy and labour to affected women at term.","PeriodicalId":137118,"journal":{"name":"New Zealand College of Midwives Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Zealand College of Midwives Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12784/nzcomjnl54.2018.3.22-29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

A Corresponding Author: rebecca@ osbornehay.co.nz B Liggins Institute, The University of Auckland; Warkworth Birthing Centre; self-employed midwife C Otago Polytechnic, Dunedin Background: Anecdotal evidence suggests midwives recognise that pregnancy and birth may be affected by cervical scarring caused by excisional procedures in the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2 and 3). Affected women seeking information about the effect on their pregnancy and labour must rely on the knowledge of maternity care providers or take guidance from consumer publications. A literature review was undertaken with the objective of exploring pregnancy and birth outcomes following cervical excisional procedures. Method: CINAHL, ProQuest, Pubmed, Google Scholar and Cochrane databases were searched for full text, peer-reviewed articles discussing either original research or systematic reviews, published from 2001-2016. Inclusion criteria were applied and comparative analysis was used to identify and compare outcomes. Findings: Seventeen articles were included for review. Fifteen articles discuss the relationship of cervical excisional procedures to an increased incidence of preterm birth. Other outcomes include the increased incidence of preterm, pre-labour rupture of membranes, or consideration of associated low birthweight related to the method or depth of excision. No articles were found which considered the provision of intrapartum care to women with a history of cervical excision procedures. Conclusion: Current research regarding the effect of cervical excision procedure history on pregnancy and birth is largely limited to quantifying the incidence of preterm birth and preterm, pre-labour rupture of membranes, or in discussing the impact of the method and depth of excision. Research to identify, describe, or best clinically manage the experience of birthing at term with cervical scarring appears to be absent. Further research is needed to extend midwifery knowledge regarding the provision of care during pregnancy and labour to affected women at term.
宫颈上皮内瘤变切除手术对妊娠和分娩的影响:文献综述
通讯作者:rebecca@ osbornehay.co.nz奥克兰大学B Liggins研究所;沃克沃斯生育中心;背景:轶事证据表明,助产士认识到妊娠和分娩可能受到宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN2和3)治疗中切除手术引起的宫颈瘢痕的影响。受影响的妇女在寻求有关其妊娠和分娩影响的信息时,必须依靠产科护理提供者的知识或从消费者出版物中获得指导。一篇文献综述是为了探讨宫颈切除手术后的妊娠和分娩结果。方法:检索2001-2016年发表的CINAHL、ProQuest、Pubmed、谷歌Scholar和Cochrane数据库的全文、同行评议的原创研究或系统评价文章。采用纳入标准,并采用比较分析来确定和比较结果。结果:纳入了17篇文章。15篇文章讨论了宫颈切除手术与早产发生率增加的关系。其他结局包括早产、产前胎膜破裂的发生率增加,或考虑与切除方法或深度相关的低出生体重。没有文章被发现,考虑提供分娩护理的妇女宫颈切除手术的历史。结论:目前关于宫颈切除手术史对妊娠和分娩影响的研究主要局限于量化早产、早产、产前胎膜破裂的发生率,或讨论切除方法和深度的影响。研究鉴定,描述,或最好的临床管理经验,足月分娩宫颈瘢痕似乎是缺席。需要进行进一步的研究,向受影响的足月妇女推广有关在怀孕和分娩期间提供护理的助产知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信