CONTENT AND SYSTEM OF FORENSIC LAW SOURCES: THE GENERAL PART

R. Kirin
{"title":"CONTENT AND SYSTEM OF FORENSIC LAW SOURCES: THE GENERAL PART","authors":"R. Kirin","doi":"10.32353/khrife.1.2020_10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The problem of studying forensic law sources, as an element of the national legal system, is becoming urgent today. By studying their systemic properties, the possibility of scientific forecasting in the development of the legal system tendency, determining courses of the most effective steps to improve the entire mechanism of legal regulation of forensic relations’ complex is increasing. \nThe article purpose is to conduct research on the prerequisites for systematizing the modern array of the forensic science legal basis in Ukraine and to identify theoretical and applied peculiarities for the formation of the general part content in the system of forensic law sources. \nTo uncover the problem and subject of examination, as well as to accomplish the tasks, the synthesis method was used, which helped to identify the main areas of legal regulation and the system of general forensic relations, the formal legal method helped to clarify the content of forensic legislation legal norms. \nAttention is drawn to the fact that the legal construction of the general part of the current Law on judicial examination from the point of view of legal technique in general and rule-making in particular is an example of legislative anachronism in which neither substantive nor formal requirements of the culture of law-making are properly observed, what directly complicates its implementation, compliance and application. \nThe need for injunctions of a general nature is emphasized with the purpose for a better understanding of the essence, objectives and content of specific injunctions. In general provisions of the basic act of forensic legislation it is offered to combine injunctions that define: the concept, terminology, content, legal basis, objectives, principles of forensic activity and their content, subject and object composition of forensic examination, as well as the powers of state, interdepartmental, departmental and public bodies on state regulation and forensic management. \nIt has been established that the content of most sources of forensic law testifies to the differentiation of their injunctions, which can be carried out in a special part according to three generic criteria: the type of forensic activity entity (based on departmental subordination, form of ownership); type of forensic examination; type of legal proceedings. \nArguments on the lack of a single scientifically based system of interconnected regulatory legal acts of forensic legislation are presented, which, as a result, created the social prerequisites for its systematization in the form of codification. The course of the highest degree of legislation perfection is substantiated, which should be presented in the form of Forensic Code of Ukraine.","PeriodicalId":340932,"journal":{"name":"Theory and Practice of Forensic Science and Criminalistics","volume":"100 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory and Practice of Forensic Science and Criminalistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32353/khrife.1.2020_10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The problem of studying forensic law sources, as an element of the national legal system, is becoming urgent today. By studying their systemic properties, the possibility of scientific forecasting in the development of the legal system tendency, determining courses of the most effective steps to improve the entire mechanism of legal regulation of forensic relations’ complex is increasing. The article purpose is to conduct research on the prerequisites for systematizing the modern array of the forensic science legal basis in Ukraine and to identify theoretical and applied peculiarities for the formation of the general part content in the system of forensic law sources. To uncover the problem and subject of examination, as well as to accomplish the tasks, the synthesis method was used, which helped to identify the main areas of legal regulation and the system of general forensic relations, the formal legal method helped to clarify the content of forensic legislation legal norms. Attention is drawn to the fact that the legal construction of the general part of the current Law on judicial examination from the point of view of legal technique in general and rule-making in particular is an example of legislative anachronism in which neither substantive nor formal requirements of the culture of law-making are properly observed, what directly complicates its implementation, compliance and application. The need for injunctions of a general nature is emphasized with the purpose for a better understanding of the essence, objectives and content of specific injunctions. In general provisions of the basic act of forensic legislation it is offered to combine injunctions that define: the concept, terminology, content, legal basis, objectives, principles of forensic activity and their content, subject and object composition of forensic examination, as well as the powers of state, interdepartmental, departmental and public bodies on state regulation and forensic management. It has been established that the content of most sources of forensic law testifies to the differentiation of their injunctions, which can be carried out in a special part according to three generic criteria: the type of forensic activity entity (based on departmental subordination, form of ownership); type of forensic examination; type of legal proceedings. Arguments on the lack of a single scientifically based system of interconnected regulatory legal acts of forensic legislation are presented, which, as a result, created the social prerequisites for its systematization in the form of codification. The course of the highest degree of legislation perfection is substantiated, which should be presented in the form of Forensic Code of Ukraine.
法医学渊源的内容与体系:总论部分
作为国家法律制度的一个组成部分,对法医学渊源的研究问题在今天变得十分紧迫。通过对其制度属性的研究,科学预测司法制度发展趋势,确定完善司法关系复杂法律规制整个机制的最有效步骤的可能性正在增加。本文旨在对乌克兰法医学法学基础现代阵列系统化的前提条件进行研究,并找出法医学法学渊源体系中总则内容形成的理论和应用特点。为了揭示问题和审查主体,完成审查任务,运用了综合法,明确了法律规制的主要领域和一般司法关系体系;运用了形式法,明确了司法立法法律规范的内容。值得注意的是,从一般的法律技术和规则制定的角度来看,现行《司法审查法》一般部分的法律构建是立法时代错误的一个例子,既没有适当遵守立法文化的实质要求,也没有适当遵守立法文化的形式要求,这直接使其实施、遵守和适用复杂化。强调一般性禁令的必要性,目的是为了更好地理解具体禁令的本质、目的和内容。在《法医立法基本法》总则中,建议将禁令结合起来,规定:司法鉴定的概念、术语、内容、法理依据、目的、司法鉴定活动原则及其内容、司法鉴定的主体和客体构成,以及国家、部门间、部门和公共机构对国家监管和司法鉴定管理的权力。已经确定的是,大多数法医学来源的内容证明了它们的禁令的区别,这些禁令可以根据三个一般标准在一个特殊的部分执行:法医活动实体的类型(基于部门从属关系,所有权形式);法医检验的类型;法律程序的类型。本文提出的论点是,缺乏一种单一的、科学的、相互关联的法医立法监管法律行为体系,这为法典化的系统化创造了社会先决条件。最高程度的立法完善过程得到了证实,这应以《乌克兰法医学法典》的形式表现出来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信