What is the SJT?

David Metcalfe, Harveer Dev
{"title":"What is the SJT?","authors":"David Metcalfe, Harveer Dev","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198805809.003.0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SJTs are commonly used by organizations for personnel selection. They aim to provide realistic, but hypothetical, scenarios and possible answers which are either selected or ranked by the candidate. One such test will contribute half, or significantly more than half, the score used by applicants to the UK Foundation Programme. The test will involve a single paper over two hours and twenty minutes in which candidates will answer 70 questions. This equates to approximately two minutes per question. Your response to 60 questions will be included in your final score, while ten questions embedded throughout the test will be pilot questions which are designed to be validated but not counted in your final score. You will not be able to differentiate pilot from genuine test questions and should answer every question as if it ‘counts’. In one SJT pilot, 96% of candidates finished the test within two hours, which provides some indication about the time pressure. It is important to answer all questions and not simply ‘guess’ those left at the end. Although the SJT is not negatively marked, random guesses are not allocated points. The scoring software will identify guesses by looking for unusual or sporadic answer patterns. The SJT will be held locally by individual medical schools under invigilated conditions. Therefore, your medical school should be in touch about specific local arrangements. Each SJT paper will include a selection of questions, each mapped to a specific professional attribute. Questions should be evenly distributed between attributes and between scenario type, i.e. ‘patient’, ‘colleague’, or ‘personal’. The SJT will include two types of question: ● multiple choice questions (approximately one- third) ● ranking questions (approximately two- thirds). These begin with a scenario and provide eight possible answers. Three of these are correct and should be selected. The remaining five are incorrect. The example in Box 2.1 provides an illustrative medical school scenario. For questions based around Foundation Programme scenarios, over 100 examples are provided for practice from onwards.","PeriodicalId":165468,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Assess and Progress: Situational Judgement Test","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oxford Assess and Progress: Situational Judgement Test","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198805809.003.0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

SJTs are commonly used by organizations for personnel selection. They aim to provide realistic, but hypothetical, scenarios and possible answers which are either selected or ranked by the candidate. One such test will contribute half, or significantly more than half, the score used by applicants to the UK Foundation Programme. The test will involve a single paper over two hours and twenty minutes in which candidates will answer 70 questions. This equates to approximately two minutes per question. Your response to 60 questions will be included in your final score, while ten questions embedded throughout the test will be pilot questions which are designed to be validated but not counted in your final score. You will not be able to differentiate pilot from genuine test questions and should answer every question as if it ‘counts’. In one SJT pilot, 96% of candidates finished the test within two hours, which provides some indication about the time pressure. It is important to answer all questions and not simply ‘guess’ those left at the end. Although the SJT is not negatively marked, random guesses are not allocated points. The scoring software will identify guesses by looking for unusual or sporadic answer patterns. The SJT will be held locally by individual medical schools under invigilated conditions. Therefore, your medical school should be in touch about specific local arrangements. Each SJT paper will include a selection of questions, each mapped to a specific professional attribute. Questions should be evenly distributed between attributes and between scenario type, i.e. ‘patient’, ‘colleague’, or ‘personal’. The SJT will include two types of question: ● multiple choice questions (approximately one- third) ● ranking questions (approximately two- thirds). These begin with a scenario and provide eight possible answers. Three of these are correct and should be selected. The remaining five are incorrect. The example in Box 2.1 provides an illustrative medical school scenario. For questions based around Foundation Programme scenarios, over 100 examples are provided for practice from onwards.
什么是SJT?
组织通常使用sjt来选择人员。他们的目的是提供现实的,但假设的场景和可能的答案,这些答案要么是由候选人选择的,要么是由候选人排名的。其中一项测试将占申请人申请英国预科课程所用分数的一半,或远远超过一半。考试将包括一份试卷,时长2小时20分钟,考生将回答70个问题。这相当于每个问题大约两分钟。你对60个问题的回答将包括在你的最终分数中,而整个测试中嵌入的10个问题将是试点问题,这些问题旨在验证但不计入你的最终分数。你将无法区分飞行员和真正的测试问题,应该回答每一个问题,如果它“计数”。在SJT的一个试点中,96%的考生在两小时内完成了测试,这表明了时间压力。重要的是回答所有问题,而不是简单地“猜测”最后剩下的问题。虽然SJT没有负标记,但随机猜测不分配分数。评分软件将通过寻找不寻常或零星的答案模式来识别猜测。SJT将由个别医学院在监考的情况下在本地举行。因此,你的医学院应该与当地的具体安排保持联系。每篇SJT论文将包括一系列问题,每个问题都映射到一个特定的专业属性。问题应该均匀地分布在属性和场景类型之间,即“病人”、“同事”或“个人”。SJT将包括两类问题:选择题(约占三分之一)、排名题(约占三分之二)。这些问题从一个场景开始,并提供了八种可能的答案。其中三个是正确的,应该选择。剩下的五个是不正确的。框2.1中的示例提供了一个说明性的医学院场景。对于基于基础课程场景的问题,提供了超过100个示例供以后练习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信