The Rise of Hedging and Regionalism: An Explanation and Evaluation of President Obama's China Policy

Jean A. Garrison, M. Wall
{"title":"The Rise of Hedging and Regionalism: An Explanation and Evaluation of President Obama's China Policy","authors":"Jean A. Garrison, M. Wall","doi":"10.1080/00927678.2016.1166892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Since the end of the Cold War, there have been many ups and downs in U.S. relations with China. Each presidential administration—whether Democrat or Republican—has pursued a policy of “engagement.” Although this term, or policy frame, has meant many things, it represents for them a broad umbrella concept that includes a range of policy options mixing cooperative and competitive approaches. The Obama administration has been no exception. This paper explains the Obama administration's engagement policy by evaluating its two central elements: (1) the bilateral relationship with China itself and (2) the rise of a pan-Asian regional policy that undergirds its rebalance to Asia. In this analysis, the Obama administration's approach encompasses both cooperative and hedging strategies, thus demonstrating more continuity than change in its approach to China. It concludes by noting that, despite the growing competition in the U.S.–China relationship, strategic rivalry is not a preordained policy outcome. Rather, the common future for both states rests on leadership and smart policy choices, not fate.","PeriodicalId":392598,"journal":{"name":"Asian Affairs: An American Review","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Affairs: An American Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00927678.2016.1166892","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Abstract Since the end of the Cold War, there have been many ups and downs in U.S. relations with China. Each presidential administration—whether Democrat or Republican—has pursued a policy of “engagement.” Although this term, or policy frame, has meant many things, it represents for them a broad umbrella concept that includes a range of policy options mixing cooperative and competitive approaches. The Obama administration has been no exception. This paper explains the Obama administration's engagement policy by evaluating its two central elements: (1) the bilateral relationship with China itself and (2) the rise of a pan-Asian regional policy that undergirds its rebalance to Asia. In this analysis, the Obama administration's approach encompasses both cooperative and hedging strategies, thus demonstrating more continuity than change in its approach to China. It concludes by noting that, despite the growing competition in the U.S.–China relationship, strategic rivalry is not a preordained policy outcome. Rather, the common future for both states rests on leadership and smart policy choices, not fate.
对冲与地区主义的兴起:对奥巴马对华政策的解释与评价
冷战结束以来,中美关系经历了多次起伏。每一届总统——无论是民主党还是共和党——都奉行“接触”政策。虽然这个术语或政策框架有很多含义,但对他们来说,它代表了一个广泛的总括概念,包括一系列混合了合作和竞争方法的政策选择。奥巴马政府也不例外。本文通过评估奥巴马政府的两个核心要素来解释其接触政策:(1)与中国本身的双边关系;(2)支撑其亚洲再平衡的泛亚地区政策的兴起。在这种分析中,奥巴马政府的做法既包括合作策略,也包括对冲策略,因此在对华政策上表现出更多的连续性,而不是变化性。报告最后指出,尽管美中关系中的竞争日益激烈,但战略竞争并不是预先注定的政策结果。相反,两国的共同未来取决于领导层和明智的政策选择,而不是命运。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信