INSLISLITE EVALUATION IN THE PROCESSING OF LIBRARY MATERIALS TOWARD USABILITY MODEL

Indira Adiadwi Putri, O. Ra, Aghesna Rahmatika Kesuma, Rahmat Iqbal
{"title":"INSLISLITE EVALUATION IN THE PROCESSING OF LIBRARY MATERIALS TOWARD USABILITY MODEL","authors":"Indira Adiadwi Putri, O. Ra, Aghesna Rahmatika Kesuma, Rahmat Iqbal","doi":"10.24042/el-pustaka.v4i1.16600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An information system can ease the user in receiving information.  The library needs to use effective and efficient service by using the information system. Processing of library materials is important to do to facilitate the search for information and expedite service activities. This research has a case study at the Bandar Lampung City Library and Archives Service which has used the INLISLite system since 2014. But until now they are still using INLISLite version 3.1. This study uses a qualitative descriptive method by conducting field research on the problems that occur, as well as interacting directly with librarians. INLISLite version 3.1 which is used displays several menus such as Back Office, Read on Place, Guest Book, Online Membership, Digital Collection Services, OPAC, Articles, Member Registration, Statistics, Surveys, Self-Returns, and Self Borrowing. The results first result from the study, librarians can process library materials on the Back Office menu. The second is there are no problems in the learnability and efficiency aspects because in this aspect the INLISLite system makes it very easy for librarians, but there are problems in the Memorability, Error, and Satisfaction aspects.","PeriodicalId":394626,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal El-Pustaka","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal El-Pustaka","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24042/el-pustaka.v4i1.16600","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An information system can ease the user in receiving information.  The library needs to use effective and efficient service by using the information system. Processing of library materials is important to do to facilitate the search for information and expedite service activities. This research has a case study at the Bandar Lampung City Library and Archives Service which has used the INLISLite system since 2014. But until now they are still using INLISLite version 3.1. This study uses a qualitative descriptive method by conducting field research on the problems that occur, as well as interacting directly with librarians. INLISLite version 3.1 which is used displays several menus such as Back Office, Read on Place, Guest Book, Online Membership, Digital Collection Services, OPAC, Articles, Member Registration, Statistics, Surveys, Self-Returns, and Self Borrowing. The results first result from the study, librarians can process library materials on the Back Office menu. The second is there are no problems in the learnability and efficiency aspects because in this aspect the INLISLite system makes it very easy for librarians, but there are problems in the Memorability, Error, and Satisfaction aspects.
图书馆资料处理过程中对可用性模型的不确定性评价
信息系统可以方便用户接收信息。图书馆需要利用信息系统提供有效、快捷的服务。处理图书馆资料对方便查阅资料和加快服务活动十分重要。本研究以楠榜市图书馆和档案服务中心为例,该中心自2014年以来一直使用INLISLite系统。但是直到现在他们还在使用INLISLite 3.1版本。本研究采用定性描述的方法,对发生的问题进行实地调查,并与图书馆员直接互动。使用的INLISLite 3.1版本显示了几个菜单,如后台办公室,就地阅读,留言簿,在线会员,数字收藏服务,OPAC,文章,成员注册,统计,调查,自我退货和自我借阅。研究的第一个结果是,图书馆员可以在Back Office菜单上处理图书馆资料。其次,在易学性和效率方面没有问题,因为在这方面,INLISLite系统使图书馆员非常容易,但在可记忆性、错误和满意度方面存在问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信