‘KIDS THESE DAYS!’ A META-ANALYSIS OF CHANGES OF ATTENTION PROBLEMS IN REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLES OF CHILDREN

B. Vekety, Alexander Logemann, John Protzko, Z. Takacs
{"title":"‘KIDS THESE DAYS!’ A META-ANALYSIS OF CHANGES OF ATTENTION PROBLEMS IN REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLES OF CHILDREN","authors":"B. Vekety, Alexander Logemann, John Protzko, Z. Takacs","doi":"10.36315/2022v2end054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"It is a common belief that the attention of new generations of children is in decline (Protzko & Schooler, 2019). However, such devastating claims about new generations are challenged when inspecting the evidence (Protzko, 2020). The current meta-analysis aimed to explore comprehensively whether attention problems have increased, decreased, or remained unchanged among children over the past decades. Findings allow us to determine whether there has been any problematic development of attention among children. Studies that used the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) with representative samples of 1.5-14 year-old children were systematically searched in multiple databases (i.e., Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar, PubMed). Informants varied between studies (i.e., teachers, self, parents), but parent-reported data was dominant. Preliminary results from the meta-regression analysis of raw scores from 22 studies showed no change in reported attention problems over the past decades (byear = -0.009, p = .72; 95%CI = -0.06 to 0.04. However, when mean age of children was analyzed in interaction with the year of data collection, we found that attention problems have increased with age over the past decades (byear× age = 0.007, p = .01; 95%CI = 0.002 to 0.011). When analyzing the percentage of maximum possible scores from the same 22 studies, there was an increase in reported attention problems over the past decades for all children (byear = 0.4493, p = .03; 95%CI = 0.03 to 0.87,), regardless of age (byear× age = -0.0022, p = .35; 95%CI = -0.07 to 0.02). These findings show that attention problems among children are increasing, and school-aged children might be especially at risk. A possible explanation of these results might be that children usually spend more time on screen from year to year (e.g., surfing on the internet, playing online games, using social media, media multitasking) which might have had a negative effect on their attention regulation skills in the last decades (Moisala et al., 2016; Rideout et al., 2010).\"","PeriodicalId":404891,"journal":{"name":"Education and New Developments 2022 – Volume 2","volume":"89 7 Pt 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education and New Developments 2022 – Volume 2","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36315/2022v2end054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

"It is a common belief that the attention of new generations of children is in decline (Protzko & Schooler, 2019). However, such devastating claims about new generations are challenged when inspecting the evidence (Protzko, 2020). The current meta-analysis aimed to explore comprehensively whether attention problems have increased, decreased, or remained unchanged among children over the past decades. Findings allow us to determine whether there has been any problematic development of attention among children. Studies that used the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) with representative samples of 1.5-14 year-old children were systematically searched in multiple databases (i.e., Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar, PubMed). Informants varied between studies (i.e., teachers, self, parents), but parent-reported data was dominant. Preliminary results from the meta-regression analysis of raw scores from 22 studies showed no change in reported attention problems over the past decades (byear = -0.009, p = .72; 95%CI = -0.06 to 0.04. However, when mean age of children was analyzed in interaction with the year of data collection, we found that attention problems have increased with age over the past decades (byear× age = 0.007, p = .01; 95%CI = 0.002 to 0.011). When analyzing the percentage of maximum possible scores from the same 22 studies, there was an increase in reported attention problems over the past decades for all children (byear = 0.4493, p = .03; 95%CI = 0.03 to 0.87,), regardless of age (byear× age = -0.0022, p = .35; 95%CI = -0.07 to 0.02). These findings show that attention problems among children are increasing, and school-aged children might be especially at risk. A possible explanation of these results might be that children usually spend more time on screen from year to year (e.g., surfing on the internet, playing online games, using social media, media multitasking) which might have had a negative effect on their attention regulation skills in the last decades (Moisala et al., 2016; Rideout et al., 2010)."
“现在的孩子们!”这是对代表性儿童样本中注意力问题变化的荟萃分析
人们普遍认为,新一代儿童的注意力正在下降(Protzko & Schooler, 2019)。然而,在检查证据时,这种关于新一代的毁灭性主张受到了挑战(Protzko, 2020)。当前的荟萃分析旨在全面探讨在过去几十年中儿童的注意力问题是否增加、减少或保持不变。研究结果使我们能够确定儿童的注意力发展是否存在问题。在多个数据库(即Web of Science、Scopus、Google Scholar、PubMed)中系统检索使用儿童行为检查表(Child Behavior Checklist, CBCL)、具有代表性的1.5-14岁儿童样本的研究。不同研究的信息提供者各不相同(即,教师、自己、家长),但家长报告的数据占主导地位。对22项研究的原始分数进行meta回归分析的初步结果显示,在过去几十年里,报告的注意力问题没有变化(byear = -0.009, p = .72;95%CI = -0.06 ~ 0.04。然而,当分析儿童的平均年龄与数据收集年份的相互作用时,我们发现在过去的几十年里,注意力问题随着年龄的增长而增加(byearx age = 0.007, p = 0.01;95%CI = 0.002 ~ 0.011)。当分析同样22项研究中最大可能得分的百分比时,在过去的几十年里,所有儿童报告的注意力问题都有所增加(byear = 0.4493, p = 0.03;95%CI = 0.03 ~ 0.87,),与年龄无关(byear× age = -0.0022, p = 0.35;95%CI = -0.07 ~ 0.02)。这些发现表明,儿童的注意力问题正在增加,学龄儿童的风险可能尤其高。对这些结果的一种可能解释可能是,儿童通常每年在屏幕上花费更多的时间(例如,上网冲浪,玩在线游戏,使用社交媒体,媒体多任务处理),这可能对他们过去几十年的注意力调节技能产生了负面影响(Moisala等人,2016;Rideout et al., 2010)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信