Interrogating the Memories of Slavery and the Slave Trade among the Ikale-Yoruba, c1640 – 1890: The Poverty of European Accounts and Response to Olatunji Ojo’s Critique

Olukoya Ogen
{"title":"Interrogating the Memories of Slavery and the Slave Trade among the Ikale-Yoruba, c1640 – 1890: The Poverty of European Accounts and Response to Olatunji Ojo’s Critique","authors":"Olukoya Ogen","doi":"10.4314/LHR.V11I1.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Against the backdrop of Olatunji Ojo’s recent submission that the slavetrade was not significant in Ikale pre-colonial history, this paper reinterrogatesthe memories of slavery and the slave trade in Ikaleland. It alsoexamines the antiquity of Ikale’s Yoruba ethnic identity and dismisses Ojo’sclaim that the Ikale were originally Edoid. Significantly, the paper correctsan avalanche of historically inaccurate, misleading and contradictoryassertions made by Ojo and reveals that Ojo’s so-called modificationsmerely reflect his ignorance of the history of the Ikale, Ilaje, Apoi, Izon andIdanre. Methodologically, the work also accuses Ojo of trying to renderjaundiced archival data on the Ikale sacrosanct. Thus, by celebrating theage long Western prejudice against the credibility of oral sources, Ojo’sapproach represents part of a neo-liberal assault on an authentic Africanhistoriography. The study concludes that Ojo’s rejoinder is muddled from ahistoriographical point of view and deficient in its understanding of Ikaleprecolonial history.","PeriodicalId":339050,"journal":{"name":"Lagos Historical Review","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lagos Historical Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/LHR.V11I1.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Against the backdrop of Olatunji Ojo’s recent submission that the slavetrade was not significant in Ikale pre-colonial history, this paper reinterrogatesthe memories of slavery and the slave trade in Ikaleland. It alsoexamines the antiquity of Ikale’s Yoruba ethnic identity and dismisses Ojo’sclaim that the Ikale were originally Edoid. Significantly, the paper correctsan avalanche of historically inaccurate, misleading and contradictoryassertions made by Ojo and reveals that Ojo’s so-called modificationsmerely reflect his ignorance of the history of the Ikale, Ilaje, Apoi, Izon andIdanre. Methodologically, the work also accuses Ojo of trying to renderjaundiced archival data on the Ikale sacrosanct. Thus, by celebrating theage long Western prejudice against the credibility of oral sources, Ojo’sapproach represents part of a neo-liberal assault on an authentic Africanhistoriography. The study concludes that Ojo’s rejoinder is muddled from ahistoriographical point of view and deficient in its understanding of Ikaleprecolonial history.
1640 - 1890年伊卡尔-约鲁巴人对奴隶制和奴隶贸易的回忆:欧洲叙述的贫困和对奥拉图吉·奥乔批判的回应
在Olatunji Ojo最近提出的奴隶贸易在冰岛前殖民历史中并不重要的观点的背景下,本文重新审视了冰岛奴隶制和奴隶贸易的记忆。它还考察了伊卡尔人的约鲁巴民族身份的古老性,并驳斥了奥乔关于伊卡尔人最初是伊多德人的说法。值得注意的是,这篇论文纠正了Ojo对历史的大量不准确、误导和矛盾的断言,并揭示了Ojo所谓的修改仅仅反映了他对Ikale、Ilaje、Apoi、Izon和didanre的历史的无知。从方法论上讲,这项工作还指责Ojo试图呈现关于伊卡尔神圣不可侵犯的带有偏见的档案数据。因此,通过颂扬西方长期以来对口述资料可信度的偏见,Ojo的方法代表了新自由主义对真实非洲史学的一部分攻击。该研究的结论是,从史学的角度来看,Ojo的反驳是混乱的,并且缺乏对肯尼亚前殖民历史的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信