Hermeneutics of Reception by Hans Robert Jauss: An Alternative Approach Toward Quranic Studies

Lathifatul Asna, Nasihun Amin
{"title":"Hermeneutics of Reception by Hans Robert Jauss: An Alternative Approach Toward Quranic Studies","authors":"Lathifatul Asna, Nasihun Amin","doi":"10.21580/ihya.24.2.13092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research attempts to offer hermeneutics of reception by Hans Robert Jauss as an alternative to understanding the Quran. Starting from the concern of some contemporary Islamic thinkers about the limitations of the classical Quran in overcoming human problems that are always dynamic, hermeneutics has become a much-demanded approach. In addition, the methodological principle of classical interpretation tends to forget the role of human participation in interpreting the Quran. Nevertheless, the practice of the reception approach has stagnated in the study of the living Quran, which only performs a simple analysis of a tradition into three reception typologies: exegesis, functional, and aesthetic, without any more profound critique. This article aims to describe Hans Robert Jauss’ hermeneutics of reception as a relevant offer to fill the void of Quranic studies from the reader's perspective. For this reason, this article is compiled using qualitative methods based on literature studies so that essential aspects that need to be considered as material for hermeneutics of reception analysis can be well elaborated. There are three crucial aspects to the hermeneutics of reception; the Horizon of expectations, the three levels of reading, and the validity of the aesthetic experience.","PeriodicalId":173945,"journal":{"name":"International Journal Ihya' 'Ulum al-Din","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal Ihya' 'Ulum al-Din","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21580/ihya.24.2.13092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research attempts to offer hermeneutics of reception by Hans Robert Jauss as an alternative to understanding the Quran. Starting from the concern of some contemporary Islamic thinkers about the limitations of the classical Quran in overcoming human problems that are always dynamic, hermeneutics has become a much-demanded approach. In addition, the methodological principle of classical interpretation tends to forget the role of human participation in interpreting the Quran. Nevertheless, the practice of the reception approach has stagnated in the study of the living Quran, which only performs a simple analysis of a tradition into three reception typologies: exegesis, functional, and aesthetic, without any more profound critique. This article aims to describe Hans Robert Jauss’ hermeneutics of reception as a relevant offer to fill the void of Quranic studies from the reader's perspective. For this reason, this article is compiled using qualitative methods based on literature studies so that essential aspects that need to be considered as material for hermeneutics of reception analysis can be well elaborated. There are three crucial aspects to the hermeneutics of reception; the Horizon of expectations, the three levels of reading, and the validity of the aesthetic experience.
汉斯·罗伯特·约斯的接受解释学:古兰经研究的另一种途径
本研究试图提供汉斯·罗伯特·约斯的接受解释学,作为理解《古兰经》的另一种选择。从一些当代伊斯兰思想家对经典《古兰经》在解决人类问题方面的局限性的担忧开始,解释学已经成为一种非常需要的方法。此外,经典解释的方法论原则往往忘记了人类在解释《古兰经》中的作用。然而,接受方法的实践已经停滞在对活的古兰经的研究中,它只是对传统进行了简单的分析,分为三种接受类型:训诂学,功能学和美学,没有任何更深刻的批判。本文旨在从读者的角度描述汉斯·罗伯特·约斯的接受解释学,以填补《古兰经》研究的空白。因此,本文在文献研究的基础上,采用定性的方法进行编写,以便对接受分析解释学需要考虑的材料的本质方面进行较好的阐述。接受解释学有三个关键方面;期望的视界,阅读的三个层次,以及审美经验的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信