FAMILY FUNCTIONING CHARACTERISTICS INVOLVED IN ADOLESCENT DEPRESSIVE SYMPTOMS

A. Caño, C. Rodríguez-Naranjo
{"title":"FAMILY FUNCTIONING CHARACTERISTICS INVOLVED IN ADOLESCENT DEPRESSIVE SYMPTOMS","authors":"A. Caño, C. Rodríguez-Naranjo","doi":"10.36315/2019INPACT064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research has shown that family functioning contributes to depressive symptoms in adolescents, with a wide range of family functioning characteristics associated to adolescent depressive symptoms. However, these family attributes have been studied through different studies, methodologies and theoretical frameworks, and do not allow envisaging a single whole picture of the family attributes associated to adolescent depressive symptoms. The objective of this study was to overcome this deficit. We followed a systematic approach and used the Family Assessment Device (FAD), which comprehensively identify six family variables in which healthy and unhealthy families differ: Problem Solving (PS), Communication (CM), Roles (RL), Affective Responsiveness (AR), Affective Involvement (AI) and Behaviour Control (BC). Independent regression analyses conducted for each variable showed that all the FAD variables significantly predicted BDI scores. However, when the six variables were introduced simultaneously in the same equation to control for the shared explained variance, only AR and AI showed significant effects, with BC approaching significance. These results were confirmed through Pratt’s measure, which showed that the non-overlapping effects of AR, AI and BC accounted for virtually the whole variance explained by the FAD dimensions. Conclusions at both methodological and applied levels emerge from these results. At a methodological level, these results prove the need for controlling the shared variance between family variables before deriving any conclusion about their role. At an applied level, they showed that the family affective aspects are the most important regarding adolescent depression, with only behaviour control playing a role within the non-affective variables.","PeriodicalId":295945,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Applications and Trends 2019","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Applications and Trends 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36315/2019INPACT064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research has shown that family functioning contributes to depressive symptoms in adolescents, with a wide range of family functioning characteristics associated to adolescent depressive symptoms. However, these family attributes have been studied through different studies, methodologies and theoretical frameworks, and do not allow envisaging a single whole picture of the family attributes associated to adolescent depressive symptoms. The objective of this study was to overcome this deficit. We followed a systematic approach and used the Family Assessment Device (FAD), which comprehensively identify six family variables in which healthy and unhealthy families differ: Problem Solving (PS), Communication (CM), Roles (RL), Affective Responsiveness (AR), Affective Involvement (AI) and Behaviour Control (BC). Independent regression analyses conducted for each variable showed that all the FAD variables significantly predicted BDI scores. However, when the six variables were introduced simultaneously in the same equation to control for the shared explained variance, only AR and AI showed significant effects, with BC approaching significance. These results were confirmed through Pratt’s measure, which showed that the non-overlapping effects of AR, AI and BC accounted for virtually the whole variance explained by the FAD dimensions. Conclusions at both methodological and applied levels emerge from these results. At a methodological level, these results prove the need for controlling the shared variance between family variables before deriving any conclusion about their role. At an applied level, they showed that the family affective aspects are the most important regarding adolescent depression, with only behaviour control playing a role within the non-affective variables.
家庭功能特征与青少年抑郁症状有关
研究表明,家庭功能有助于青少年抑郁症状,与青少年抑郁症状相关的家庭功能特征范围广泛。然而,这些家庭特征是通过不同的研究、方法和理论框架来研究的,因此无法对与青少年抑郁症状相关的家庭特征形成一个单一的整体图景。本研究的目的是克服这一缺陷。我们采用了一种系统的方法,并使用了家庭评估装置(FAD),该装置全面确定了健康家庭和不健康家庭不同的六个家庭变量:问题解决(PS)、沟通(CM)、角色(RL)、情感反应(AR)、情感参与(AI)和行为控制(BC)。对各变量进行独立回归分析表明,FAD变量均能显著预测BDI评分。然而,当在同一方程中同时引入六个变量来控制共享解释方差时,只有AR和AI表现出显著影响,BC接近显著性。这些结果通过Pratt的测量得到了证实,该测量表明,AR、AI和BC的非重叠效应几乎占了FAD维度解释的全部方差。从这些结果中可以得出方法论和应用层面的结论。在方法学层面上,这些结果证明了在得出关于其作用的任何结论之前,需要控制家庭变量之间的共同方差。在应用层面上,他们表明家庭情感方面对青少年抑郁症是最重要的,只有行为控制在非情感变量中起作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信