Do 'Dig Once' and Permitting Policies Improve Fiber Availability?

Christina Biedny, Brian E. Whitacre, Roberto Gallardo
{"title":"Do 'Dig Once' and Permitting Policies Improve Fiber Availability?","authors":"Christina Biedny, Brian E. Whitacre, Roberto Gallardo","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3895985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"State and local governments have enacted different types of legislation aimed at improving broadband availability. Two unstudied policies of interest are: (1) “dig-once” policies requiring state-funded construction projects to notify local internet providers about the opportunity to bury conduit for easier wire installation in the future, and (2) permitting policies requiring an expeditious response from local jurisdictions regarding the installation of broadband equipment. We use the example of Iowa, which passed legislation on both of these topics in 2015 and compare trends in fiber broadband availability with that of states who did not pass such legislation. We also consider the potential impact on fixed wireless availability, which largely depends upon a fiber middle mile. We use coarsened exact matching at the census tract level to construct treated and control groups with similar pre-2015 demographic characteristics and broadband availability trends in Iowa and other states. Difference-in-difference regression analysis using the matched samples then assesses the policy impact on fiber and fixed wireless availability post-implementation. The results suggest that Iowa’s policies increased fiber broadband availability by roughly five percentage points when compared to states with similar other broadband policies. However, the impact disappears when the control group is restricted to only states from the same region or to those that with similar levels of federal broadband funding. The policies do not appear to have any effect on fixed wireless availability.","PeriodicalId":113748,"journal":{"name":"Public Economics: Publicly Provided Goods eJournal","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Economics: Publicly Provided Goods eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3895985","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

State and local governments have enacted different types of legislation aimed at improving broadband availability. Two unstudied policies of interest are: (1) “dig-once” policies requiring state-funded construction projects to notify local internet providers about the opportunity to bury conduit for easier wire installation in the future, and (2) permitting policies requiring an expeditious response from local jurisdictions regarding the installation of broadband equipment. We use the example of Iowa, which passed legislation on both of these topics in 2015 and compare trends in fiber broadband availability with that of states who did not pass such legislation. We also consider the potential impact on fixed wireless availability, which largely depends upon a fiber middle mile. We use coarsened exact matching at the census tract level to construct treated and control groups with similar pre-2015 demographic characteristics and broadband availability trends in Iowa and other states. Difference-in-difference regression analysis using the matched samples then assesses the policy impact on fiber and fixed wireless availability post-implementation. The results suggest that Iowa’s policies increased fiber broadband availability by roughly five percentage points when compared to states with similar other broadband policies. However, the impact disappears when the control group is restricted to only states from the same region or to those that with similar levels of federal broadband funding. The policies do not appear to have any effect on fixed wireless availability.
“一次挖掘”和许可政策是否提高了光纤的可用性?
州和地方政府已经制定了不同类型的立法,旨在提高宽带的可用性。两项尚未研究的政策是:(1)“一次性挖掘”政策,要求国家资助的建设项目通知当地互联网提供商有机会埋设管道,以便将来更容易安装电线;(2)允许政策,要求地方司法管辖区对宽带设备的安装作出迅速反应。我们以爱荷华州为例,该州在2015年通过了关于这两个主题的立法,并将光纤宽带可用性的趋势与未通过此类立法的州进行了比较。我们还考虑了对固定无线可用性的潜在影响,这在很大程度上取决于中间一英里的光纤。我们在人口普查区水平上使用粗糙的精确匹配方法,在爱荷华州和其他州建立了具有相似的2015年前人口特征和宽带可用性趋势的实验组和对照组。然后使用匹配样本进行差分回归分析,评估策略在实施后对光纤和固定无线可用性的影响。结果表明,与其他有类似宽带政策的州相比,爱荷华州的政策使光纤宽带的可用性提高了大约5个百分点。然而,当对照组仅限于来自同一地区的州或联邦宽带资金水平相似的州时,这种影响就消失了。这些策略似乎对固定无线可用性没有任何影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信