Simulation and comparison of path restoration techniques in SDH mesh networks

S. Ruepp, L. Dittman, L. Ellegard
{"title":"Simulation and comparison of path restoration techniques in SDH mesh networks","authors":"S. Ruepp, L. Dittman, L. Ellegard","doi":"10.1109/DRCN.2005.1563842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates by simulation whether path restoration in a SDH mesh network is more resource effi'cient than traditional protection for a single link failure. The two examined restoration methods are based on the algorithm by Ford and Fulkerson for finding flow augmenting paths, and on the Dijkstra algorithm for finding the shortest path. The methods are studied for two different link upgrading strategies, and for a restoration strategy that adds links to the network. The different methods are compared by simulation with respect to capacity usage, restoration path length (hop count) and number of necessary link upgrades. Our study shows that network restoration can be more resource efficient and requires fewer link upgrades than traditional protection, particularly when applying the Dijkstra method. However, a longer restoration path is required compared to traditional protection. Index Terms path restoration, restoration simulation","PeriodicalId":415896,"journal":{"name":"DRCN 2005). Proceedings.5th International Workshop on Design of Reliable Communication Networks, 2005.","volume":"64 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DRCN 2005). Proceedings.5th International Workshop on Design of Reliable Communication Networks, 2005.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DRCN.2005.1563842","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This paper investigates by simulation whether path restoration in a SDH mesh network is more resource effi'cient than traditional protection for a single link failure. The two examined restoration methods are based on the algorithm by Ford and Fulkerson for finding flow augmenting paths, and on the Dijkstra algorithm for finding the shortest path. The methods are studied for two different link upgrading strategies, and for a restoration strategy that adds links to the network. The different methods are compared by simulation with respect to capacity usage, restoration path length (hop count) and number of necessary link upgrades. Our study shows that network restoration can be more resource efficient and requires fewer link upgrades than traditional protection, particularly when applying the Dijkstra method. However, a longer restoration path is required compared to traditional protection. Index Terms path restoration, restoration simulation
SDH网状网络中路径恢复技术的仿真与比较
本文通过仿真研究了SDH网状网络中的路径恢复是否比传统的单链路故障保护更具资源效率。所研究的两种恢复方法分别基于Ford和Fulkerson用于寻找流量增强路径的算法,以及用于寻找最短路径的Dijkstra算法。研究了两种不同的链路升级策略,以及向网络中添加链路的恢复策略。通过仿真比较了不同方法的容量使用情况、恢复路径长度(跳数)和必要的链路升级数量。我们的研究表明,网络恢复可以比传统保护更有效地利用资源,并且需要更少的链路升级,特别是当应用Dijkstra方法时。然而,与传统的保护相比,需要更长的修复路径。索引条款路径还原,还原仿真
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信