{"title":"The Balanced Scorecard Combined with an Alternative Costing System: An Effective Contribution to Governance","authors":"A. Mcnab, Chris Carr, Falconer Mitchell","doi":"10.23823/SIBBALDIA/2010.139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This project investigated whether a strategy framework such as the Balanced Scorecard (BSC), linked to a Performance Management System (PMS), would, compared to a more standard model of strategic planning, improve focus and research output by botanic gardens worldwide. The focus of the project shifted as the opportunity arose to develop an objective costing system linked to the related PMS, which allowed the researchers to posit that the BSC framework could provide a more effective contribution to governance. The research output was based on an in-depth case study at the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh employing documentary analysis and innovative action research techniques adopting a constructive approach. This paper has been adapted for Sibbaldia having previously been published by the Chartered Institute of Management Accountants (CIMA) Research Project R220 (Macnab et al., 2010).","PeriodicalId":106362,"journal":{"name":"Sibbaldia: the Journal of Botanic Garden Horticulture","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sibbaldia: the Journal of Botanic Garden Horticulture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23823/SIBBALDIA/2010.139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This project investigated whether a strategy framework such as the Balanced Scorecard (BSC), linked to a Performance Management System (PMS), would, compared to a more standard model of strategic planning, improve focus and research output by botanic gardens worldwide. The focus of the project shifted as the opportunity arose to develop an objective costing system linked to the related PMS, which allowed the researchers to posit that the BSC framework could provide a more effective contribution to governance. The research output was based on an in-depth case study at the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh employing documentary analysis and innovative action research techniques adopting a constructive approach. This paper has been adapted for Sibbaldia having previously been published by the Chartered Institute of Management Accountants (CIMA) Research Project R220 (Macnab et al., 2010).
该项目调查了一个战略框架,如与绩效管理系统(PMS)相联系的平衡计分卡(BSC),与更标准的战略规划模型相比,是否能提高全球植物园的注意力和研究成果。随着开发与相关PMS相关的客观成本计算系统的机会出现,项目的重点转移,这使研究人员能够假设平衡计分卡框架可以为治理提供更有效的贡献。研究成果基于爱丁堡皇家植物园的深入案例研究,采用文献分析和创新的行动研究技术,采用建设性的方法。本文已改编为Sibbaldia,之前由特许管理会计师协会(CIMA)研究项目R220 (Macnab et al., 2010)出版。