{"title":"A New Evaluation Method of Communication for Distributed Control","authors":"Jason J. Scarlett, R. Brennan","doi":"10.1109/DIS.2006.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Distributed systems are relying more heavily on event-triggered system architectures such as UML and IEC 61499. Existing communication protocols can support the high-level communication within these systems, but there is contention as to which low-level protocol to use, or if any exist that meet the requirements of being event-triggered and hard realtime. This paper presents a new way to measure communication performance. The goal of the new measurement method is to stress the necessity that a system be both efficient and fair. This is illustrated by comparing three communication strategies; controller area network (CAN), time-triggered CAN (TTCAN), and alternating priority CAN. The first two represent the extremes between event-triggered and time-triggered communication strategies. The third is introduced to illustrate the benefits of the new measurement technique","PeriodicalId":318812,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Workshop on Distributed Intelligent Systems: Collective Intelligence and Its Applications (DIS'06)","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Workshop on Distributed Intelligent Systems: Collective Intelligence and Its Applications (DIS'06)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DIS.2006.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
Distributed systems are relying more heavily on event-triggered system architectures such as UML and IEC 61499. Existing communication protocols can support the high-level communication within these systems, but there is contention as to which low-level protocol to use, or if any exist that meet the requirements of being event-triggered and hard realtime. This paper presents a new way to measure communication performance. The goal of the new measurement method is to stress the necessity that a system be both efficient and fair. This is illustrated by comparing three communication strategies; controller area network (CAN), time-triggered CAN (TTCAN), and alternating priority CAN. The first two represent the extremes between event-triggered and time-triggered communication strategies. The third is introduced to illustrate the benefits of the new measurement technique