Commentary on the Judgement of the Supreme Administrative Court of February 26, 2019 (II FSK 3436/18)

Jędrzej Owoc
{"title":"Commentary on the Judgement of the Supreme Administrative Court of February 26, 2019 (II FSK 3436/18)","authors":"Jędrzej Owoc","doi":"10.17951/ppa.2021.4.145-152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"subject of the commentary is the analysis of article 318 (1) of the EPa, which provides that an application for postponement of payment of an increased environmental fee (administrative civil penalty) should be submitted before the deadline for the payment. That requ-ires the explanation of the legal nature of the deadline for an application for postponement of payment of an increased environmental fee (administrative civil penalty), i.e. whether it is a substantive law or a procedural deadline. in the commented judgement the supreme administrative Court is in favour of a procedural deadline.","PeriodicalId":298732,"journal":{"name":"Przegląd Prawa Administracyjnego","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Przegląd Prawa Administracyjnego","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17951/ppa.2021.4.145-152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

subject of the commentary is the analysis of article 318 (1) of the EPa, which provides that an application for postponement of payment of an increased environmental fee (administrative civil penalty) should be submitted before the deadline for the payment. That requ-ires the explanation of the legal nature of the deadline for an application for postponement of payment of an increased environmental fee (administrative civil penalty), i.e. whether it is a substantive law or a procedural deadline. in the commented judgement the supreme administrative Court is in favour of a procedural deadline.
最高行政法院2019年2月26日判决评注(II FSK 3436/18)
评注的主题是对《环境保护法》第318(1)条的分析,该条规定应在付款截止日期之前提出延期支付增加的环境费(行政民事处罚)的申请。这就需要解释申请延期支付增加的环境费(行政民事处罚)的最后期限的法律性质,即它是实体法的最后期限还是程序性的最后期限。在评议的判决中,最高行政法院赞成程序性最后期限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信