Inspection Regulation between General Procedural Codification and Field Specifics – a Case Study of Slovenia

P. Kovač
{"title":"Inspection Regulation between General Procedural Codification and Field Specifics – a Case Study of Slovenia","authors":"P. Kovač","doi":"10.1515/danb-2016-0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Inspection, as the authoritative supervision of private liable persons to comply their activities with sector-specific laws, should ensure the full implementation of public policies. Slovenia adopted the Inspection Act (IA) in 2002, in order to conduct efficient inspection, and simultaneously guarantee the defence rights of the supervised parties pursuant to the fundamental principles of the EU, the national Constitution, and general Administrative Procedure Act. This article addresses the search for a balance between general codification and sector-related specifics as stipulated by the IA, applying normative, constitutional case law and comparative methods. Special attention is dedicated to the IA rules regarding participants, their legal protection and stages of respective proceedings. It has been concluded that the most of the IA specifics are justified in order to efficiently serve the public interest. This study reveals that the Slovene IA can represent a role model for efficient yet democratic supervision in other MS as well.","PeriodicalId":208928,"journal":{"name":"DANUBE: Law and Economics Review","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DANUBE: Law and Economics Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/danb-2016-0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Inspection, as the authoritative supervision of private liable persons to comply their activities with sector-specific laws, should ensure the full implementation of public policies. Slovenia adopted the Inspection Act (IA) in 2002, in order to conduct efficient inspection, and simultaneously guarantee the defence rights of the supervised parties pursuant to the fundamental principles of the EU, the national Constitution, and general Administrative Procedure Act. This article addresses the search for a balance between general codification and sector-related specifics as stipulated by the IA, applying normative, constitutional case law and comparative methods. Special attention is dedicated to the IA rules regarding participants, their legal protection and stages of respective proceedings. It has been concluded that the most of the IA specifics are justified in order to efficiently serve the public interest. This study reveals that the Slovene IA can represent a role model for efficient yet democratic supervision in other MS as well.
一般程序法典与实地细节之间的检验规则——以斯洛文尼亚为例
摘要检查作为监督私人责任人遵守行业法律的权威手段,应确保公共政策的全面实施。斯洛文尼亚于2002年通过了《检查法》(IA),以便进行有效的检查,同时根据欧盟的基本原则、国家宪法和一般行政程序法保障被监督方的辩护权。本文运用规范性、宪制判例法和比较方法,探讨如何在一般编纂和保险业规定的行业相关细节之间寻求平衡。本处特别关注保险业监督有关参与者、他们的法律保障和各自诉讼阶段的规则。我们的结论是,为了有效地服务公众利益,保险业监督的大部分具体规定都是合理的。这项研究表明,斯洛文尼亚的IA也可以作为其他MS有效而民主监督的榜样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书