How concept drift can impair the classification of fake news

R. M. Silva, Tiago A. Almeida
{"title":"How concept drift can impair the classification of fake news","authors":"R. M. Silva, Tiago A. Almeida","doi":"10.5753/kdmile.2021.17469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fake news is a serious problem that can influence political choices, harm people's physical and mental health, promote treatments without scientific evidence, and even incite violence. Machine learning methods are one of the leading solutions that have been studied for filtering fake news automatically. However, most studies do not consider the dynamic nature of news, creating static models and evaluating them offline through the traditional holdout or cross-validation. These studies naively assume that news characteristics do not change over time and, therefore, the performance of offline models is preserved as time goes on. In this study, we show how concept drift can impair the classification of fake news. We aim to verify whether the conclusions obtained in studies that disregarded the dynamic nature of the news are sustained. We analyzed how the performance of methods trained in an offline fashion is affected by the news update over time, including concept drift due to impacting events like the Covid-19 pandemic and the United States presidential election. The results showed that the performance of offline models is over-optimistic. Incremental learning methods should be preferred because they can adapt to changes in textual patterns over time.","PeriodicalId":391667,"journal":{"name":"Anais do IX Symposium on Knowledge Discovery, Mining and Learning (KDMiLe 2021)","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anais do IX Symposium on Knowledge Discovery, Mining and Learning (KDMiLe 2021)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5753/kdmile.2021.17469","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Fake news is a serious problem that can influence political choices, harm people's physical and mental health, promote treatments without scientific evidence, and even incite violence. Machine learning methods are one of the leading solutions that have been studied for filtering fake news automatically. However, most studies do not consider the dynamic nature of news, creating static models and evaluating them offline through the traditional holdout or cross-validation. These studies naively assume that news characteristics do not change over time and, therefore, the performance of offline models is preserved as time goes on. In this study, we show how concept drift can impair the classification of fake news. We aim to verify whether the conclusions obtained in studies that disregarded the dynamic nature of the news are sustained. We analyzed how the performance of methods trained in an offline fashion is affected by the news update over time, including concept drift due to impacting events like the Covid-19 pandemic and the United States presidential election. The results showed that the performance of offline models is over-optimistic. Incremental learning methods should be preferred because they can adapt to changes in textual patterns over time.
概念漂移如何影响假新闻的分类
假新闻是一个严重的问题,它可以影响政治选择,损害人们的身心健康,在没有科学证据的情况下推广治疗方法,甚至煽动暴力。机器学习方法是目前研究的自动过滤假新闻的主要解决方案之一。然而,大多数研究没有考虑新闻的动态性,而是创建静态模型,并通过传统的保留或交叉验证来离线评估它们。这些研究天真地假设新闻特征不会随着时间的推移而改变,因此,离线模型的性能随着时间的推移而保持不变。在本研究中,我们展示了概念漂移如何损害假新闻的分类。我们的目的是验证在忽视新闻动态性质的研究中得出的结论是否成立。我们分析了以离线方式训练的方法的性能如何受到新闻更新的影响,包括由于Covid-19大流行和美国总统大选等影响事件造成的概念漂移。结果表明,离线模型的性能过于乐观。增量学习方法应该是首选,因为它们可以适应文本模式随时间的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书