Comparative evaluation of intravenous tramadol and dexmedetomidine for treatment of shivering after spinal anesthesia

Siddhanta Choudhury, Bimal Panda, D. Pradhan, Neha Padhi, D. Soren, Debjani Seth
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of intravenous tramadol and dexmedetomidine for treatment of shivering after spinal anesthesia","authors":"Siddhanta Choudhury, Bimal Panda, D. Pradhan, Neha Padhi, D. Soren, Debjani Seth","doi":"10.4103/jssrp.jssrp_18_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Intraoperative shivering is a common complication in neuraxial anesthesia, with an incidence of 40%–50%. Shivering is an uncomfortable experience for the patient. It has many severe effects, such as increased oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production, causing arterial hypoxia and myocardial ischemia. It contributes to delayed wound healing and late discharge from postanesthetic care. Our study aimed at a comparative evaluation of intravenous (IV) tramadol and dexmedetomidine to treat shivering after spinal anesthesia. Materials and Methods: The present work was a randomized, prospective, double-blinded study conducted at VIMSAR, Burla. One hundred patients of the American Society of Anesthesiologists Grades I and II (18–65 years of age), posted for various surgical procedures under spinal anesthesia who developed shivering, were included. After randomization, they were grouped into two groups (50 patients each). Injection dexmedetomidine (0.5 μg/kg) in Group D and injection tramadol (1 mg/kg) in Group T were given as a slow IV bolus. Grade and time taken for the onset of shivering were recorded after the spinal anesthesia. Time for cessation of shivering after IV bolus, recurrence of shivering, response rate, hemodynamic and side effects such as bradycardia, hypotension, nausea, sedation, and vomiting were analyzed. Results: Cessation of shivering was achieved earlier in Group D (3.04±0.94) than in Group T (6.62±1.49). The response rate was 100% in both groups. Vomiting and nausea were very high in Group T (30%). Twenty percent of patients were sedated with a sedation score of 2 in Group D only. A recurrence of shivering was observed in Group T (24%), requiring a repeat dose administration. Conclusion: Both tramadol and dexmedetomidine are effective in controlling shivering, but the time taken for cessation of shivering and adverse effects observed in the case of dexmedetomidine were lesser. Dexmedetomidine also provided complete cessation of shivering.","PeriodicalId":355285,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Specialties and Rural Practice","volume":"122 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Specialties and Rural Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jssrp.jssrp_18_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intraoperative shivering is a common complication in neuraxial anesthesia, with an incidence of 40%–50%. Shivering is an uncomfortable experience for the patient. It has many severe effects, such as increased oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production, causing arterial hypoxia and myocardial ischemia. It contributes to delayed wound healing and late discharge from postanesthetic care. Our study aimed at a comparative evaluation of intravenous (IV) tramadol and dexmedetomidine to treat shivering after spinal anesthesia. Materials and Methods: The present work was a randomized, prospective, double-blinded study conducted at VIMSAR, Burla. One hundred patients of the American Society of Anesthesiologists Grades I and II (18–65 years of age), posted for various surgical procedures under spinal anesthesia who developed shivering, were included. After randomization, they were grouped into two groups (50 patients each). Injection dexmedetomidine (0.5 μg/kg) in Group D and injection tramadol (1 mg/kg) in Group T were given as a slow IV bolus. Grade and time taken for the onset of shivering were recorded after the spinal anesthesia. Time for cessation of shivering after IV bolus, recurrence of shivering, response rate, hemodynamic and side effects such as bradycardia, hypotension, nausea, sedation, and vomiting were analyzed. Results: Cessation of shivering was achieved earlier in Group D (3.04±0.94) than in Group T (6.62±1.49). The response rate was 100% in both groups. Vomiting and nausea were very high in Group T (30%). Twenty percent of patients were sedated with a sedation score of 2 in Group D only. A recurrence of shivering was observed in Group T (24%), requiring a repeat dose administration. Conclusion: Both tramadol and dexmedetomidine are effective in controlling shivering, but the time taken for cessation of shivering and adverse effects observed in the case of dexmedetomidine were lesser. Dexmedetomidine also provided complete cessation of shivering.
曲马多与右美托咪定静脉注射治疗脊髓麻醉后寒战的比较评价
背景:术中寒战是神经轴麻醉的常见并发症,发生率为40%-50%。颤抖对病人来说是一种不舒服的经历。它有许多严重的影响,如增加氧气消耗和二氧化碳的产生,引起动脉缺氧和心肌缺血。它有助于延迟伤口愈合和延迟出院的美学后护理。本研究旨在比较评价静脉曲马多和右美托咪定治疗脊髓麻醉后寒战的疗效。材料和方法:本研究是一项随机、前瞻性、双盲研究,在布拉的VIMSAR进行。100名来自美国麻醉师协会的I级和II级(18-65岁)患者,在脊柱麻醉下进行各种外科手术,出现颤抖。随机分组后分为两组(每组50例)。D组注射右美托咪定(0.5 μg/kg), T组注射曲马多(1 mg/kg)慢速静脉滴注。记录脊髓麻醉后寒战发生的程度和时间。分析静脉注射后寒战停止时间、寒战复发率、反应率、血流动力学和副作用,如心动过缓、低血压、恶心、镇静和呕吐。结果:D组止颤时间(3.04±0.94)早于T组(6.62±1.49)。两组的有效率均为100%。T组呕吐和恶心发生率很高(30%)。只有D组20%的患者镇静评分为2分。T组观察到寒战复发(24%),需要重复给药。结论:曲马多和右美托咪定均能有效控制寒战,但右美托咪定的停止寒战所需时间和不良反应较小。右美托咪定也能完全停止颤抖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信