EVALUATION OF PROGRAM OUTCOMES IN THE ACCREDITATION PROCESS: A RESEARCH ON THE CASE OF ATATURK UNIVERSITY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE

Mustafa Özgeri̇ş, Serkan Özer
{"title":"EVALUATION OF PROGRAM OUTCOMES IN THE ACCREDITATION PROCESS: A RESEARCH ON THE CASE OF ATATURK UNIVERSITY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE","authors":"Mustafa Özgeri̇ş, Serkan Özer","doi":"10.32328/turkjforsci.1147438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Program accreditation in higher education, which determines the extent to which academic and vocational standards in a particular field are met by a higher education program by an accreditation body; measurement, evaluation and external quality assurance process. There are some criteria used in evaluation in accreditation processes of higher education programs. One of these criteria is program outputs. Program outcomes are the knowledge, skills and behaviors that a higher education program provides to its students during their education. The aim of this study is to examine the program output determination, update and measurement-evaluation processes carried out as part of the accreditation studies of the Department of Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Design of Atatürk University. Within the scope of the study, the accreditation self-assessment report of the department, department quality commission reports and stakeholder meeting reports were examined and a survey was conducted to reach the program outputs. With the study, it has been evaluated that accreditation processes can play a pioneering role in establishing certain standards for landscape architecture education and developing measures by continuously monitoring the quality of education with measurement and evaluation methods. In addition, it has been concluded that an evaluation based on the opinions of the faculty members and students at the graduation stage will be insufficient in evaluating the level of achievement of the program outputs, and it will be more accurate to apply for the opinions of graduates who have graduated from the program and have at least 1-2 years of working experience in the sector.","PeriodicalId":227277,"journal":{"name":"TURKISH JOURNAL OF FOREST SCIENCE","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TURKISH JOURNAL OF FOREST SCIENCE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32328/turkjforsci.1147438","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Program accreditation in higher education, which determines the extent to which academic and vocational standards in a particular field are met by a higher education program by an accreditation body; measurement, evaluation and external quality assurance process. There are some criteria used in evaluation in accreditation processes of higher education programs. One of these criteria is program outputs. Program outcomes are the knowledge, skills and behaviors that a higher education program provides to its students during their education. The aim of this study is to examine the program output determination, update and measurement-evaluation processes carried out as part of the accreditation studies of the Department of Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Design of Atatürk University. Within the scope of the study, the accreditation self-assessment report of the department, department quality commission reports and stakeholder meeting reports were examined and a survey was conducted to reach the program outputs. With the study, it has been evaluated that accreditation processes can play a pioneering role in establishing certain standards for landscape architecture education and developing measures by continuously monitoring the quality of education with measurement and evaluation methods. In addition, it has been concluded that an evaluation based on the opinions of the faculty members and students at the graduation stage will be insufficient in evaluating the level of achievement of the program outputs, and it will be more accurate to apply for the opinions of graduates who have graduated from the program and have at least 1-2 years of working experience in the sector.
认证过程中项目成果的评估:以阿塔图尔克大学景观建筑为例的研究
高等教育项目认证,它决定了认证机构的高等教育项目在某一特定领域达到学术和职业标准的程度;测量、评价和外部质量保证过程。在高等教育项目的认证过程中,有一些标准用于评估。其中一个标准是程序输出。课程成果是高等教育课程在学生接受教育期间提供给他们的知识、技能和行为。本研究的目的是检查项目输出的确定、更新和测量评估过程,作为atatrk大学建筑与设计学院景观设计系认证研究的一部分。在研究范围内,本署评审自评报告、部门质素委员会报告及持份者会议报告均予审阅,并进行调查,以达致计划的成果。研究结果表明,认证过程可以在建立景观设计教育标准和制定措施方面发挥先锋作用,通过测量和评估方法持续监测教育质量。此外,根据毕业阶段的教师和学生的意见进行评估,对于评估项目产出的成就水平是不够的,申请项目毕业并在该领域至少有1-2年工作经验的毕业生的意见会更准确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信