What Do University Students Think About The Roles Of Intellectuals? Empirical Findings of a Hungarian Analysis

Veronika Bocsi
{"title":"What Do University Students Think About The Roles Of Intellectuals? Empirical Findings of a Hungarian Analysis","authors":"Veronika Bocsi","doi":"10.33422/4th.icrhs.2021.05.20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a debate in the field of social sciences about the role of intellectuals. More possible directions can be distinguished: professional, intelligentsia and public intellectual. These types have got their own historical, geographical and political backgrounds but if we regard universities as places in which intellectuals are trained we have to highlight the importance of higher education at the same time. Despite the wide theoretical background empirical findings have narrowly been known. In this paper quantitative method was used and we try to analyze what university students think about the role components of intellectuals. Our database came from 2017 from a nationwide Hungarian student analysis (N=1502). We created our own made question-block with 18 items and undergraduates had to scale these items which belong to the role components of intellectuals. We can state that students have got a mixed pattern in the analyzed field. The components of professional role are strong – and this fits into the national educational policies – but other elements are significant too. The features of classical intellectual habitus are strong as well (general knowledge, white collar work etc.), but the components of public intellectuals and macro-level aims have less importance.","PeriodicalId":170842,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of ‏The 4th International Conference on Research in Humanities and Social Sciences","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of ‏The 4th International Conference on Research in Humanities and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33422/4th.icrhs.2021.05.20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a debate in the field of social sciences about the role of intellectuals. More possible directions can be distinguished: professional, intelligentsia and public intellectual. These types have got their own historical, geographical and political backgrounds but if we regard universities as places in which intellectuals are trained we have to highlight the importance of higher education at the same time. Despite the wide theoretical background empirical findings have narrowly been known. In this paper quantitative method was used and we try to analyze what university students think about the role components of intellectuals. Our database came from 2017 from a nationwide Hungarian student analysis (N=1502). We created our own made question-block with 18 items and undergraduates had to scale these items which belong to the role components of intellectuals. We can state that students have got a mixed pattern in the analyzed field. The components of professional role are strong – and this fits into the national educational policies – but other elements are significant too. The features of classical intellectual habitus are strong as well (general knowledge, white collar work etc.), but the components of public intellectuals and macro-level aims have less importance.
大学生如何看待知识分子的角色?匈牙利分析的实证结果
在社会科学领域有一场关于知识分子角色的争论。更多可能的方向可以区分为:专业、知识分子和公共知识分子。这些类型的人都有自己的历史、地理和政治背景,但如果我们把大学看作是培养知识分子的地方,我们必须同时强调高等教育的重要性。尽管理论背景广泛,但实证研究结果却鲜为人知。本文采用定量分析的方法,试图分析大学生对知识分子角色构成的看法。我们的数据库来自2017年全国匈牙利学生分析(N=1502)。我们制作了自己的题组,共有18个题项,大学生需要对这些属于知识分子角色成分的题项进行测量。我们可以说,学生在分析的领域中有一个混合的模式。专业角色的组成部分是强大的,这符合国家教育政策,但其他因素也很重要。经典知识分子习性的特征也很强(一般知识、白领工作等),但公共知识分子的构成和宏观目标的重要性较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信