Structural Limits to the De-Westernization of the Communication Field: The Editorial Board in Clarivate's JCR System

Afonso de Albuquerque, Thaiane Moreira de Oliveira, Marcelo Alves dos Santos Junior, Sofia Oliveira Firmo de Albuquerque
{"title":"Structural Limits to the De-Westernization of the Communication Field: The Editorial Board in Clarivate's JCR System","authors":"Afonso de Albuquerque, Thaiane Moreira de Oliveira, Marcelo Alves dos Santos Junior, Sofia Oliveira Firmo de Albuquerque","doi":"10.1093/ccc/tcaa015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Since the 2000s, calls for de-Westernizing the international communication research have been common, but their practical result has been very modest, as the share of non-western countries remained minimal. This article explores the hypothesis that structural factors hamper the diversity in international media research, based on the analysis of the membership of journals listed in Clarivate's Journal of Citation Reports. The data demonstrate a strong unbalance in favor of the US -- and a particular group of US universities in special -- to the detriment of the non-Western countries. The article discusses these findings in reference to the emergence of academic capitalism and the global rankings logic, which is based on ``universal'' defined from a US (and secondarily Anglophonic) viewpoint. The JCR system plays an important role in this schema, as it artificially introduces scarcity in the international publishing system and, therefore, concentrates symbolic power in the hands of a few.","PeriodicalId":300302,"journal":{"name":"Communication, Culture and Critique","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication, Culture and Critique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ccc/tcaa015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Since the 2000s, calls for de-Westernizing the international communication research have been common, but their practical result has been very modest, as the share of non-western countries remained minimal. This article explores the hypothesis that structural factors hamper the diversity in international media research, based on the analysis of the membership of journals listed in Clarivate's Journal of Citation Reports. The data demonstrate a strong unbalance in favor of the US -- and a particular group of US universities in special -- to the detriment of the non-Western countries. The article discusses these findings in reference to the emergence of academic capitalism and the global rankings logic, which is based on ``universal'' defined from a US (and secondarily Anglophonic) viewpoint. The JCR system plays an important role in this schema, as it artificially introduces scarcity in the international publishing system and, therefore, concentrates symbolic power in the hands of a few.
传播领域去西方化的结构性限制:科睿唯安JCR系统的编辑委员会
自2000年代以来,国际传播研究“去西方化”的呼声一直很普遍,但其实际效果非常有限,因为非西方国家的份额仍然很小。本文通过对Clarivate《Journal of Citation Reports》期刊成员的分析,探讨了结构性因素阻碍国际媒体研究多样性的假设。数据显示出一种强烈的不平衡,这种不平衡有利于美国,特别是一群美国大学,而不利于非西方国家。本文将根据学术资本主义的出现和全球排名逻辑来讨论这些发现,全球排名逻辑是基于美国(其次是英语国家)观点所定义的“普遍”。JCR系统在这一模式中扮演着重要的角色,因为它人为地在国际出版系统中引入了稀缺性,因此将象征性的权力集中在少数人手中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信