Effect of Insecticide Placement on the Phytotoxicity of Planting Time Insecticides and Their Interaction with Herbicides

G. Hein, R. Wilson
{"title":"Effect of Insecticide Placement on the Phytotoxicity of Planting Time Insecticides and Their Interaction with Herbicides","authors":"G. Hein, R. Wilson","doi":"10.5274/JSBR.32.4.185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Experiments were conducted to determine the influence of insecticide placement on phytotoxicity to sugarbeet. A greenhouse study showed that post planting chlorpyrifos application did not damage sugarbeet as much as similar applications at planting. The lack of differences in sugarbeet injury between the placement of chlorpyrifos in the furrow (T-band) and on the surface indicates that surface applications can cause significant damage. In two field studies we found that insecticide placement was an important factor in determining the potential for insecticide phytotoxicity on sugarbeet. The greatest injury was obtained when chlorpyrifos, fonofos, and terbufos were placed behind the furrow openers and in front of the press wheel. This placement would be the most likely to result in closer association between the insecticide granules and the seed. Both the modified in-furrow chlorpyrifos treatment and the band in front of the press wheel resulted in substantial sugarbeet damage, even at the lower rates. Insecticide bands ahead of the planter unit resulted in intermediate damage. Band applying the insecticides to the rear of the press wheel resulted in the least phytotoxicity. Apparently, the sealing action of the press wheel reduces the contact with the seed and prevents the insecticide from mixing in the upper layers of the soil. Insecticide placement behind the press wheel provided the best protection from phytotoxicity ; however, even this placement did not eliminate the potential for phytotoxicity.","PeriodicalId":403165,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sugarbeet Research","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sugarbeet Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5274/JSBR.32.4.185","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Experiments were conducted to determine the influence of insecticide placement on phytotoxicity to sugarbeet. A greenhouse study showed that post planting chlorpyrifos application did not damage sugarbeet as much as similar applications at planting. The lack of differences in sugarbeet injury between the placement of chlorpyrifos in the furrow (T-band) and on the surface indicates that surface applications can cause significant damage. In two field studies we found that insecticide placement was an important factor in determining the potential for insecticide phytotoxicity on sugarbeet. The greatest injury was obtained when chlorpyrifos, fonofos, and terbufos were placed behind the furrow openers and in front of the press wheel. This placement would be the most likely to result in closer association between the insecticide granules and the seed. Both the modified in-furrow chlorpyrifos treatment and the band in front of the press wheel resulted in substantial sugarbeet damage, even at the lower rates. Insecticide bands ahead of the planter unit resulted in intermediate damage. Band applying the insecticides to the rear of the press wheel resulted in the least phytotoxicity. Apparently, the sealing action of the press wheel reduces the contact with the seed and prevents the insecticide from mixing in the upper layers of the soil. Insecticide placement behind the press wheel provided the best protection from phytotoxicity ; however, even this placement did not eliminate the potential for phytotoxicity.
施用杀虫剂对种植期杀虫剂植物毒性的影响及其与除草剂的相互作用
通过试验研究了施用杀虫剂对甜菜植物毒性的影响。一项温室研究表明,种植后施用毒死蜱对甜菜的危害不如种植时施用。在沟内(t波段)施用毒死蜱和在地表施用毒死蜱对甜菜的伤害没有差异,这表明地表施用毒死蜱可造成重大损害。在两项田间研究中,我们发现杀虫剂的放置是决定杀虫剂对甜菜潜在植物毒性的重要因素。在开沟器的后面和压压轮的前面,毒死蜱、氟fofos和terbufos的伤害最大。这种放置最有可能使杀虫剂颗粒和种子之间的联系更紧密。改良的沟内毒死蜱处理和压榨轮前带处理都导致了大量的甜菜损害,即使在较低的率下也是如此。播种机前方的杀虫剂带造成了中等伤害。在压轮后部施用杀虫剂的植物毒性最小。显然,压轮的密封作用减少了与种子的接触,防止杀虫剂混入土壤的上层。将杀虫剂放置在压榨轮后对植物毒性的保护效果最好;然而,即使这样放置也没有消除植物毒性的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信