Perceptions of the current COVID situation and health, social and economic impact of the current scenario among a rural setting in Anuradhapura district
P. Chulasiri, T. Ruwanpathirana, N. Gunawardena, Champika Wickramasinghe, Buddhi Lokuketagoda
{"title":"Perceptions of the current COVID situation and health, social and economic impact of the current scenario among a rural setting in Anuradhapura district","authors":"P. Chulasiri, T. Ruwanpathirana, N. Gunawardena, Champika Wickramasinghe, Buddhi Lokuketagoda","doi":"10.4038/jpgim.8298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Sri Lanka used a holistic approach with many stringent measures to successfully control COVID-19. The paper provides a snapshot of a rural farming community’s understanding of COVID-19 and their experiences in relation to the efforts of the Government. Methods A cross-sectional study among 731 farming adults in the Anuradhapura District with data collected through telephone interviews. Results One-third were 41-50 years of age (37.1%). Almost all identified the symptoms of COVID-19 (97%-96.7%) and main modes of spread (87.2%-97.5%) but the possibility of transmission by asymptomatic persons was less known (51.7%). A great majority (95%-98.8%) accurately identified the main methods of preventing COVID-19. The most prevalent myths were consuming alcohol to prevent COVID-19 (84.5%) and children/young adults not being susceptible (83.6%). Television was the commonest source of information (96%). Social media was not popular. Two-thirds (66.2%) with non-communicable disease received medications delivered to their home during locked-down periods. No participant (0%) reported food shortages and primary/secondary school education had continued through print material delivered to homes. One-third (35.2 %) were financially worse off and three-fourths (75.8%) were not able to continue farming activities due to lack of pesticides/insecticides (36.7%) and fertilizers (39.4%). Conclusions This rural farming community demonstrated a good understanding of COVID-19 and their experiences related to accessing essential health services were fair","PeriodicalId":425054,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Postgraduate Institute of Medicine","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Postgraduate Institute of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/jpgim.8298","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Background Sri Lanka used a holistic approach with many stringent measures to successfully control COVID-19. The paper provides a snapshot of a rural farming community’s understanding of COVID-19 and their experiences in relation to the efforts of the Government. Methods A cross-sectional study among 731 farming adults in the Anuradhapura District with data collected through telephone interviews. Results One-third were 41-50 years of age (37.1%). Almost all identified the symptoms of COVID-19 (97%-96.7%) and main modes of spread (87.2%-97.5%) but the possibility of transmission by asymptomatic persons was less known (51.7%). A great majority (95%-98.8%) accurately identified the main methods of preventing COVID-19. The most prevalent myths were consuming alcohol to prevent COVID-19 (84.5%) and children/young adults not being susceptible (83.6%). Television was the commonest source of information (96%). Social media was not popular. Two-thirds (66.2%) with non-communicable disease received medications delivered to their home during locked-down periods. No participant (0%) reported food shortages and primary/secondary school education had continued through print material delivered to homes. One-third (35.2 %) were financially worse off and three-fourths (75.8%) were not able to continue farming activities due to lack of pesticides/insecticides (36.7%) and fertilizers (39.4%). Conclusions This rural farming community demonstrated a good understanding of COVID-19 and their experiences related to accessing essential health services were fair