Investigating Vertical and Horizontal Force-Velocity Profiles in Club-Level Field Hockey Athletes: Do Mechanical Characteristics Transfer Between Orientation of Movement?

Dylan Hicks, C. Drummond, Kym J. Williams, R. van den Tillaar
{"title":"Investigating Vertical and Horizontal Force-Velocity Profiles in Club-Level Field Hockey Athletes: Do Mechanical Characteristics Transfer Between Orientation of Movement?","authors":"Dylan Hicks, C. Drummond, Kym J. Williams, R. van den Tillaar","doi":"10.47206/ijsc.v3i1.188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To inform physical preparation strategies in field hockey athletes, this cross-sectional study investigated the transfer of mechanical characteristics in different force-vectors and determined the correlations between vertical and horizontal force-velocity profiles and performance outcomes. Thirty-one club-level field hockey athletes (age: 23.1 ± 4.3yrs, body mass: 70.6 ± 10.3kg, height: 1.72 ± 0.09m) performed vertical (jump) force-velocity profiles by performing countermovement jumps at three incremental loads, and horizontal (sprint) force-velocity profiles by performing maximal 30-meter sprint efforts. When comparing matched mechanical variables between F-v profiles in each force orientation, small to moderate significant correlations (0.37 ≤ r ≥ 0.62, p ≤ 0.03) were observed for relative theoretical maximal force (F0), power (PMAX) and theoretical maximal velocity (v0). The performance outcomes of both F-v profiles highlighted a large, significant negative correlation (r = -0.86, p = 0.001) between variables. Multiple linear regression analysis of F-v profiles identified F0 and v0 accounted for 74% and 94% of the variability in jump height and sprint time respectively, however v0 appeared to be a greater predictor of both performance outcomes. Due to the significant relationships between variables, the results of this study suggest vertical and horizontal F-v profiling explain the same key lower-limb mechanical characteristics, despite the orientation of the movement task. With club-level field hockey athletes, coaches could therefore use mechanical profiling methods interchangeably and prescribe physical preparation interventions to assess neuromuscular function plus mechanical strengths and weaknesses by performing one force-velocity assessment only.","PeriodicalId":170948,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Strength and Conditioning","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Strength and Conditioning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47206/ijsc.v3i1.188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

To inform physical preparation strategies in field hockey athletes, this cross-sectional study investigated the transfer of mechanical characteristics in different force-vectors and determined the correlations between vertical and horizontal force-velocity profiles and performance outcomes. Thirty-one club-level field hockey athletes (age: 23.1 ± 4.3yrs, body mass: 70.6 ± 10.3kg, height: 1.72 ± 0.09m) performed vertical (jump) force-velocity profiles by performing countermovement jumps at three incremental loads, and horizontal (sprint) force-velocity profiles by performing maximal 30-meter sprint efforts. When comparing matched mechanical variables between F-v profiles in each force orientation, small to moderate significant correlations (0.37 ≤ r ≥ 0.62, p ≤ 0.03) were observed for relative theoretical maximal force (F0), power (PMAX) and theoretical maximal velocity (v0). The performance outcomes of both F-v profiles highlighted a large, significant negative correlation (r = -0.86, p = 0.001) between variables. Multiple linear regression analysis of F-v profiles identified F0 and v0 accounted for 74% and 94% of the variability in jump height and sprint time respectively, however v0 appeared to be a greater predictor of both performance outcomes. Due to the significant relationships between variables, the results of this study suggest vertical and horizontal F-v profiling explain the same key lower-limb mechanical characteristics, despite the orientation of the movement task. With club-level field hockey athletes, coaches could therefore use mechanical profiling methods interchangeably and prescribe physical preparation interventions to assess neuromuscular function plus mechanical strengths and weaknesses by performing one force-velocity assessment only.
研究俱乐部水平曲棍球运动员的垂直和水平力-速度剖面:运动方向之间的机械特性转移吗?
为了给曲棍球运动员的体能准备策略提供信息,本横断面研究调查了不同力矢量下力学特性的传递,并确定了垂直和水平力速度剖面与表现结果之间的相关性。31名俱乐部水平曲棍球运动员(年龄:23.1±4.3岁,体重:70.6±10.3kg,身高:1.72±0.09m)在三个增量负荷下进行反向跳跃,进行垂直(跳跃)力-速度分析,并通过最大30米冲刺进行水平(冲刺)力-速度分析。在比较各力向F-v曲线的匹配力学变量时,相对理论最大力(F0)、功率(PMAX)和理论最大速度(v0)的相关性为小到中等显著性(0.37≤r≥0.62,p≤0.03)。两种F-v曲线的表现结果都突出了变量之间的显著负相关(r = -0.86, p = 0.001)。对F-v曲线的多元线性回归分析发现,F0和v0分别占跳跃高度和冲刺时间变异的74%和94%,但v0似乎是两种表现结果的更大预测因子。由于变量之间的显著关系,本研究的结果表明,尽管运动任务的方向不同,垂直和水平F-v剖面解释了相同的关键下肢力学特征。因此,对于俱乐部级别的曲棍球运动员,教练可以互换使用机械分析方法,并规定物理准备干预措施,通过仅进行一次力-速度评估来评估神经肌肉功能和机械优势和劣势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信