Evaluation of Move Method Refactorings Recommendation Algorithms: Are We Doing It Right?

Evgenii Novozhilov, Ivan Veselov, Mikhail Pravilov, T. Bryksin
{"title":"Evaluation of Move Method Refactorings Recommendation Algorithms: Are We Doing It Right?","authors":"Evgenii Novozhilov, Ivan Veselov, Mikhail Pravilov, T. Bryksin","doi":"10.1109/IWoR.2019.00012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previous studies introduced various techniques for detecting Move Method refactoring opportunities. However, different authors have different evaluations, which leads to the fact that results reported by different papers do not correlate with each other and it is almost impossible to understand which algorithm works better in practice. In this paper, we provide an overview of existing evaluation approaches for Move Method refactoring recommendation algorithms, as well as discuss their advantages and disadvantages. We propose a tool that can be used for generating large synthetic datasets suitable for both algorithms evaluation and building complex machine learning models for Move Method refactoring recommendation.","PeriodicalId":393051,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE/ACM 3rd International Workshop on Refactoring (IWoR)","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE/ACM 3rd International Workshop on Refactoring (IWoR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IWoR.2019.00012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Previous studies introduced various techniques for detecting Move Method refactoring opportunities. However, different authors have different evaluations, which leads to the fact that results reported by different papers do not correlate with each other and it is almost impossible to understand which algorithm works better in practice. In this paper, we provide an overview of existing evaluation approaches for Move Method refactoring recommendation algorithms, as well as discuss their advantages and disadvantages. We propose a tool that can be used for generating large synthetic datasets suitable for both algorithms evaluation and building complex machine learning models for Move Method refactoring recommendation.
移动方法重构推荐算法的评价:我们做得对吗?
以前的研究介绍了各种检测Move Method重构机会的技术。然而,不同的作者有不同的评价,这导致不同论文报告的结果并不相互关联,几乎不可能理解哪种算法在实践中更好。在本文中,我们概述了现有的Move Method重构推荐算法的评估方法,并讨论了它们的优缺点。我们提出了一种工具,可用于生成适合算法评估和构建复杂机器学习模型的大型合成数据集,用于Move Method重构推荐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信