Analysis of the theory of mind indicators in children from different baby home social-emotional environment

R. Muhamedrahimov, D. Kagarmanov, E. Sergienko
{"title":"Analysis of the theory of mind indicators in children from different baby home social-emotional environment","authors":"R. Muhamedrahimov, D. Kagarmanov, E. Sergienko","doi":"10.21638/spbu16.2022.401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined whether the structure of the theory of mind indicators in the group of institutionalized children would be associated with differences of social-emotional environment in two Russian Baby Homes (BHs), one of which received Training plus Structural Changes (T+SC) intervention, that increased caregiver sensitivity and consistency, the other continued to conduct baseness as usial (No Intervention, NoI) and defined as social-emotionally depriving. The relevant to the theory of mind items of the personal-social scale of the Battelle Developmental Inventory were selected and used to assess children in T+SC (N=70; M=2.37, SD=1.01 years) and NoI (N=50; M=2.18, SD=0.92 years). Results suggested between-group differences in the factor structure for the theory of mind indicators. The main factor for children from NoI reflected development of self-understanding in combination with understanding of adults and peers, while for children from T+SC — of self-understanding in combination with understanding of adults, which might be due to opportunity for children to live in the small size group and interact with more sensitive and consistent primary caregivers. The second factor in both BHs revealed development by children understanding of peer interactions and feelings, and difference between BHs was that for children from depriving NoI environment such understanding was combined with understanding of caregivers’ instructions and rules. Results suggest that children’s environment shapes their theory of mind and that positive changes in institutional caregiving can have some benefits in children’s self-understanding and understanding of other people.","PeriodicalId":388528,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu16.2022.401","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined whether the structure of the theory of mind indicators in the group of institutionalized children would be associated with differences of social-emotional environment in two Russian Baby Homes (BHs), one of which received Training plus Structural Changes (T+SC) intervention, that increased caregiver sensitivity and consistency, the other continued to conduct baseness as usial (No Intervention, NoI) and defined as social-emotionally depriving. The relevant to the theory of mind items of the personal-social scale of the Battelle Developmental Inventory were selected and used to assess children in T+SC (N=70; M=2.37, SD=1.01 years) and NoI (N=50; M=2.18, SD=0.92 years). Results suggested between-group differences in the factor structure for the theory of mind indicators. The main factor for children from NoI reflected development of self-understanding in combination with understanding of adults and peers, while for children from T+SC — of self-understanding in combination with understanding of adults, which might be due to opportunity for children to live in the small size group and interact with more sensitive and consistent primary caregivers. The second factor in both BHs revealed development by children understanding of peer interactions and feelings, and difference between BHs was that for children from depriving NoI environment such understanding was combined with understanding of caregivers’ instructions and rules. Results suggest that children’s environment shapes their theory of mind and that positive changes in institutional caregiving can have some benefits in children’s self-understanding and understanding of other people.
不同家庭社会情绪环境下幼儿心理理论指标分析
本研究考察了两个俄罗斯婴儿之家(BHs)的机构化儿童群体心理理论指标结构是否与社会情感环境差异有关,其中一个接受训练加结构变化(T+SC)干预,增加了照顾者的敏感性和一致性,另一个继续进行常规的基础(无干预,NoI)并定义为社会情感剥夺。选取Battelle发展量表个人-社会量表中与心理理论相关的项目,对儿童的T+SC进行评估(N=70;M=2.37, SD=1.01年)和NoI (N=50;M=2.18, SD=0.92年)。结果表明,心理理论指标的因子结构存在组间差异。NoI儿童的主要因素反映了自我理解与成人和同伴理解相结合的发展,而T+SC儿童的主要因素是自我理解与成人理解相结合的发展,这可能是由于儿童有机会生活在小群体中,并与更敏感和一致的主要照顾者互动。两家健康照护机构的第二个因素都揭示了儿童对同伴互动和感受的理解的发展,而两家健康照护机构的区别在于,对于剥夺NoI环境的儿童,这种理解与照顾者的指示和规则的理解结合在一起。结果表明,儿童的环境塑造了他们的心理理论,机构照料的积极变化对儿童的自我理解和对他人的理解有一定的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信