Comparison of Plug Flow and Multi-Node Stratified Tank Modeling Approaches Regarding Computational Efficiency and Accuracy

Fernando Karg Bulnes, Kyle R. Gluesenkamp, J. Rendall
{"title":"Comparison of Plug Flow and Multi-Node Stratified Tank Modeling Approaches Regarding Computational Efficiency and Accuracy","authors":"Fernando Karg Bulnes, Kyle R. Gluesenkamp, J. Rendall","doi":"10.1115/IMECE2020-23369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Residential water heaters contain water stratified by temperature-driven density differences. This implies that a water tank can reach a state in which the top and bottom sections have different temperatures, unless mixing happens. A high degree of thermal stratification can improve the efficiency of some water heaters, by saving the amount of energy required for the heat-up process. Studies of stratification became popular in the 1970s and it remains an active research topic today. The research has led to the development of different models and techniques to better predict and define a stratified tanks behavior. By comparing these models and techniques used previously to describe thermal stratification, the phenomenon could be better understood, exploited, and used to increase efficiency and thermal energy capacity in modern water tanks. From the existing models, we found the one-dimensional standard plug-flow and a multi node model to be appropriate for analyzing the processes of the heat up and cool-down in a water tank. These two models are based on energy balances. This work involved comparing the accuracy and computational effort needed to implement these models. To assess accuracy, we compared both types of existing models to experimental data (also collected in this work) which included a heat up process using an external heat pump. This external process included a layering process that has an eddy diffusivity at five times the rate of thermal diffusion. For this project, we implemented the models in MATLAB, the multi-paradigm numerical computing environment. We quantified model accuracy using the root mean squared error between modeled data and experimental data for six measured tank temperatures. Comparing the accuracy and the computational time taken to run the simulation provides a method to contrast the performance of each model and a way to rate it. The multi node model was run using from 6 to 96 spatial nodes; the plug flow model was run using 1 to 0.001 °C temperature bin sizes. Additionally, timesteps were varied from 4 to 236 s. The results quantify the tradeoff between accuracy and computational time, providing guidance for simulations to intelligently select the best model type and simulation parameters. This research can be used to validate the pre-existing models and possibly improve the modern water tank.","PeriodicalId":112698,"journal":{"name":"Volume 10: Fluids Engineering","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 10: Fluids Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2020-23369","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Residential water heaters contain water stratified by temperature-driven density differences. This implies that a water tank can reach a state in which the top and bottom sections have different temperatures, unless mixing happens. A high degree of thermal stratification can improve the efficiency of some water heaters, by saving the amount of energy required for the heat-up process. Studies of stratification became popular in the 1970s and it remains an active research topic today. The research has led to the development of different models and techniques to better predict and define a stratified tanks behavior. By comparing these models and techniques used previously to describe thermal stratification, the phenomenon could be better understood, exploited, and used to increase efficiency and thermal energy capacity in modern water tanks. From the existing models, we found the one-dimensional standard plug-flow and a multi node model to be appropriate for analyzing the processes of the heat up and cool-down in a water tank. These two models are based on energy balances. This work involved comparing the accuracy and computational effort needed to implement these models. To assess accuracy, we compared both types of existing models to experimental data (also collected in this work) which included a heat up process using an external heat pump. This external process included a layering process that has an eddy diffusivity at five times the rate of thermal diffusion. For this project, we implemented the models in MATLAB, the multi-paradigm numerical computing environment. We quantified model accuracy using the root mean squared error between modeled data and experimental data for six measured tank temperatures. Comparing the accuracy and the computational time taken to run the simulation provides a method to contrast the performance of each model and a way to rate it. The multi node model was run using from 6 to 96 spatial nodes; the plug flow model was run using 1 to 0.001 °C temperature bin sizes. Additionally, timesteps were varied from 4 to 236 s. The results quantify the tradeoff between accuracy and computational time, providing guidance for simulations to intelligently select the best model type and simulation parameters. This research can be used to validate the pre-existing models and possibly improve the modern water tank.
塞流与多节点分层罐建模方法计算效率和精度的比较
住宅热水器含有由温度驱动的密度差分层的水。这意味着水箱可以达到顶部和底部温度不同的状态,除非发生混合。高度的热分层可以通过节省加热过程所需的能量来提高一些热水器的效率。分层研究在20世纪70年代开始流行,今天仍然是一个活跃的研究课题。这项研究促进了不同模型和技术的发展,以更好地预测和定义分层储罐的行为。通过比较以前用于描述热分层的这些模型和技术,可以更好地理解、利用并用于提高现代水箱的效率和热能容量。从已有的模型中,我们发现一维标准塞流模型和多节点模型适合于分析水箱的升温和降温过程。这两个模型是基于能量平衡的。这项工作包括比较实现这些模型所需的准确性和计算量。为了评估准确性,我们将两种现有模型与实验数据(也在本工作中收集)进行了比较,其中包括使用外部热泵的加热过程。这个外部过程包括一个分层过程,它的涡流扩散率是热扩散率的五倍。在这个项目中,我们在多范式数值计算环境MATLAB中实现了模型。我们使用六个测量槽温度的模型数据和实验数据之间的均方根误差来量化模型精度。比较运行仿真所需的精度和计算时间提供了一种方法来对比每个模型的性能并对其进行评级。采用6 ~ 96个空间节点运行多节点模型;塞流模型使用1至0.001°C的温度桶尺寸运行。此外,时间步长从4秒到236秒不等。结果量化了精度和计算时间之间的权衡,为仿真智能选择最佳模型类型和仿真参数提供了指导。该研究可用于验证已有的模型,并可能对现代水箱进行改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信