Inside Out: Fourteen Antitheses Authenticating Cities

P. Taylor, G. O’Brien, P. O'keefe
{"title":"Inside Out: Fourteen Antitheses Authenticating Cities","authors":"P. Taylor, G. O’Brien, P. O'keefe","doi":"10.1332/policypress/9781529210477.003.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This is the first chapter on unthinking, specifically unthinking modernity. It takes the form of 14 statements that are presented as basic modern theses, and which are countered by antitheses, alternative positions wherein urban demand is central to the argument. This thesis/antithesis device is used to broach three broad areas. First, the relationship between cities and states are considered with the former identified as constituting social development. Second, the role of cities in that social development is used to undermine modern time and spatial framings of change. Third, these contrarian ideas are brought to bear on the study of anthropogenic climate change, inserting cities as mass demand mechanisms. All this unthinking is intended to foster a fundamental mindscape break pointing towards transmodern sensibilities..","PeriodicalId":351372,"journal":{"name":"Cities Demanding the Earth","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cities Demanding the Earth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781529210477.003.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This is the first chapter on unthinking, specifically unthinking modernity. It takes the form of 14 statements that are presented as basic modern theses, and which are countered by antitheses, alternative positions wherein urban demand is central to the argument. This thesis/antithesis device is used to broach three broad areas. First, the relationship between cities and states are considered with the former identified as constituting social development. Second, the role of cities in that social development is used to undermine modern time and spatial framings of change. Third, these contrarian ideas are brought to bear on the study of anthropogenic climate change, inserting cities as mass demand mechanisms. All this unthinking is intended to foster a fundamental mindscape break pointing towards transmodern sensibilities..
Inside Out: 14个反例验证城市
这是关于不思考的第一章,特别是关于不思考的现代性。它以14个陈述的形式呈现为基本的现代论点,并被对立的替代立场所反驳,其中城市需求是论点的核心。这种正反装置用于拉削三个大的区域。首先,考虑城市与国家之间的关系,将城市与国家确定为社会发展的组成部分。其次,城市在社会发展中的作用被用来破坏现代时间和空间变化框架。第三,这些相反的观点被引入到人为气候变化的研究中,将城市作为大众需求机制。所有这些不加思考的想法都是为了培养一种基本的思维景观突破,指向超现代的情感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信