{"title":"The Entangled Field of Temporary Urbanism","authors":"M. Ferreri","doi":"10.5117/9789462984912_CH02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The chapter analyses the emergence of pop-up and temporary urbanism\n in the UK after the 2008 global financial crisis as an entangled field made\n of competing narratives and representations. Media coverage, public\n events and self-representation are discussed to outline how official and\n unofficial narratives are constructed, mobilised and performed. Focusing\n on London, it presents a critical cultural discussion of transfers and translations\n between central and local government officers, property investors\n and estate agents, and third-sector ‘meanwhile space’ intermediaries.\n Temporary urbanism at times of post-crisis austerity is confirmed as an\n ambiguous urban cultural discourse that raises the promise of practices\n of dissent and vacant space re-appropriation, such as community-oriented\n radical practices and squatting, while practically foreclosing them.","PeriodicalId":371064,"journal":{"name":"The Permanence of Temporary Urbanism","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Permanence of Temporary Urbanism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5117/9789462984912_CH02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The chapter analyses the emergence of pop-up and temporary urbanism
in the UK after the 2008 global financial crisis as an entangled field made
of competing narratives and representations. Media coverage, public
events and self-representation are discussed to outline how official and
unofficial narratives are constructed, mobilised and performed. Focusing
on London, it presents a critical cultural discussion of transfers and translations
between central and local government officers, property investors
and estate agents, and third-sector ‘meanwhile space’ intermediaries.
Temporary urbanism at times of post-crisis austerity is confirmed as an
ambiguous urban cultural discourse that raises the promise of practices
of dissent and vacant space re-appropriation, such as community-oriented
radical practices and squatting, while practically foreclosing them.