Forging the Bee Line Railroad 1848–1889: The Rise and Fall of the Hoosier Partisans and Cleveland Clique by Arthur Andrew Olson III (review)

Paul D. Yandle
{"title":"Forging the Bee Line Railroad 1848–1889: The Rise and Fall of the Hoosier Partisans and Cleveland Clique by Arthur Andrew Olson III (review)","authors":"Paul D. Yandle","doi":"10.1353/WVH.2017.0023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"is antithetical to the teachings of Jesus. The second predominately Christian wing is Creation Care. This includes some leading evangelicals and is more theocentric. While still concerned with humanitarian concerns, Creation Care highlights portions of the Bible that teach the earth itself belongs to God and as such people have a responsibility to care for it, just as they care for each other. Fi nally, Witt discusses biocentric groups that are not rooted in the JudeoChristian tradition. These advocates see an inherent value in the earth not connected to humanity or any deity. While not opposed to religion, they utilize those ideas about the sacredness of earth and the interdependence of all things, which they enhance with scientific findings. The conclusion offers an assessment of the state of anti– MTR activism. He reminds readers that, despite the overlap in concern, there are notable differences that produce points of friction, “where activists made decisions on argument and tactics, accepting some and rejecting others” (197). Disagreements are rooted in differences of religion and location. Disputes arise between activists from Appalachia and those from outside, even those who share similar religious beliefs. These evaluations highlight the larger analy sis of religion and place. A master of the multiple historiographies involved, Witt recognizes the centrality of place and identity to the discussion of religion and mountaintop removal in Appalachia. His work is among the few that link religion and environmentalism. His firsthand experiences and interviews prove that such connections arise organically within local communities precisely because faith entails community and these par tic u lar communities are set within a unique environment. He understands the historical importance of both religion and mountains to Appalachians, but resists the temptation to oversimplify and generalize. Appalachians are diverse, as are their faiths, but the common thread among them is the mountains. That bond means that environmental policy in the region will always involve more than economics and politics. As Witt shows, it is the defining facets of life, such as faith and community, that continue to drive Appalachian activism in the twentyfirst century. Joseph Super West Virginia University","PeriodicalId":350051,"journal":{"name":"West Virginia History: A Journal of Regional Studies","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"West Virginia History: A Journal of Regional Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/WVH.2017.0023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

is antithetical to the teachings of Jesus. The second predominately Christian wing is Creation Care. This includes some leading evangelicals and is more theocentric. While still concerned with humanitarian concerns, Creation Care highlights portions of the Bible that teach the earth itself belongs to God and as such people have a responsibility to care for it, just as they care for each other. Fi nally, Witt discusses biocentric groups that are not rooted in the JudeoChristian tradition. These advocates see an inherent value in the earth not connected to humanity or any deity. While not opposed to religion, they utilize those ideas about the sacredness of earth and the interdependence of all things, which they enhance with scientific findings. The conclusion offers an assessment of the state of anti– MTR activism. He reminds readers that, despite the overlap in concern, there are notable differences that produce points of friction, “where activists made decisions on argument and tactics, accepting some and rejecting others” (197). Disagreements are rooted in differences of religion and location. Disputes arise between activists from Appalachia and those from outside, even those who share similar religious beliefs. These evaluations highlight the larger analy sis of religion and place. A master of the multiple historiographies involved, Witt recognizes the centrality of place and identity to the discussion of religion and mountaintop removal in Appalachia. His work is among the few that link religion and environmentalism. His firsthand experiences and interviews prove that such connections arise organically within local communities precisely because faith entails community and these par tic u lar communities are set within a unique environment. He understands the historical importance of both religion and mountains to Appalachians, but resists the temptation to oversimplify and generalize. Appalachians are diverse, as are their faiths, but the common thread among them is the mountains. That bond means that environmental policy in the region will always involve more than economics and politics. As Witt shows, it is the defining facets of life, such as faith and community, that continue to drive Appalachian activism in the twentyfirst century. Joseph Super West Virginia University
《1848-1889年打造Bee铁路:印第安纳游击队和克利夫兰集团的兴衰》,作者:亚瑟·安德鲁·奥尔森三世(书评)
与耶稣的教导是对立的。第二个主要的基督教派别是创造关怀。这包括一些主要的福音派,更以神为中心。在关注人道主义问题的同时,创造关怀强调了圣经中教导地球本身属于上帝的部分,因此人们有责任照顾它,就像他们互相照顾一样。最后,威特讨论了不植根于犹太基督教传统的生物中心团体。这些倡导者看到了地球的内在价值,与人类或任何神灵无关。虽然不反对宗教,但他们利用地球的神圣性和万物相互依存的观念,并用科学发现来加强这些观念。结论提供了对反港铁激进主义状态的评估。他提醒读者,尽管在关注方面存在重叠,但也存在显著的差异,产生了摩擦点,“激进分子在争论和策略上做出决定,接受一些,拒绝另一些”(197)。分歧的根源是宗教和地域的不同。来自阿巴拉契亚地区的活动人士与来自外部的活动人士之间,甚至是那些有着相似宗教信仰的人之间,也会出现争议。这些评价强调了对宗教和地域的更大的分析。作为一名精通多种史学的大师,威特认识到阿巴拉契亚地区宗教和山顶迁移的讨论中地点和身份的中心地位。他的作品是为数不多的将宗教与环保主义联系起来的作品之一。他的第一手经验和采访证明,这种联系是在当地社区中有机产生的,正是因为信仰需要社区,而这些特殊的社区是在一个独特的环境中建立的。他明白宗教和山脉对阿巴拉契亚人的历史重要性,但他抵制住了过度简化和概括的诱惑。阿巴拉契亚人是多种多样的,他们的信仰也是如此,但他们之间的共同点是山脉。这种联系意味着,该地区的环境政策将永远不仅仅涉及经济和政治。正如维特所言,在21世纪,生活的决定性方面,如信仰和社区,继续推动着阿巴拉契亚人的行动主义。约瑟夫超级西弗吉尼亚大学
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信