Model Validation via Uncertainty Propagation Using Response Surface Models

Lusine Baghdasaryan, Wei Chen, T. Buranathiti, Jian Cao
{"title":"Model Validation via Uncertainty Propagation Using Response Surface Models","authors":"Lusine Baghdasaryan, Wei Chen, T. Buranathiti, Jian Cao","doi":"10.1115/DETC2002/DAC-34140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Model validation has become a primary means to evaluate accuracy and reliability of computational simulations in engineering design. Mathematical models enable engineers to establish what the most likely response of a system is. However, despite the enormous power of computational models, uncertainty is inevitable in all model-based engineering design problems, due to the variation in the physical system itself, or lack of knowledge, and the use of assumptions by model builders. Therefore, realistic mathematical models should contemplate uncertainties. Due to the uncertainties, the assessment of the validity of a modeling approach must be conducted based on stochastic measurements to provide designers with the confidence of using a model. In this paper, a generic model validation methodology via uncertainty propagation is presented. The approach reduces the number of physical testing at each design setting to one by shifting the evaluation effort to uncertainty propagation of the computational model. Response surface methodology is used to create metamodels as less costly approximations of simulation models for uncertainty propagation. The methodology is illustrated with the examination of the validity of a finite-element analysis model for predicting springback angles in a sample flanging process.","PeriodicalId":132526,"journal":{"name":"Volume 2: 28th Design Automation Conference","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 2: 28th Design Automation Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2002/DAC-34140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Model validation has become a primary means to evaluate accuracy and reliability of computational simulations in engineering design. Mathematical models enable engineers to establish what the most likely response of a system is. However, despite the enormous power of computational models, uncertainty is inevitable in all model-based engineering design problems, due to the variation in the physical system itself, or lack of knowledge, and the use of assumptions by model builders. Therefore, realistic mathematical models should contemplate uncertainties. Due to the uncertainties, the assessment of the validity of a modeling approach must be conducted based on stochastic measurements to provide designers with the confidence of using a model. In this paper, a generic model validation methodology via uncertainty propagation is presented. The approach reduces the number of physical testing at each design setting to one by shifting the evaluation effort to uncertainty propagation of the computational model. Response surface methodology is used to create metamodels as less costly approximations of simulation models for uncertainty propagation. The methodology is illustrated with the examination of the validity of a finite-element analysis model for predicting springback angles in a sample flanging process.
基于响应面模型的不确定性传播模型验证
模型验证已成为工程设计中评估计算仿真准确性和可靠性的主要手段。数学模型使工程师能够确定系统最可能的反应是什么。然而,尽管计算模型具有巨大的力量,但由于物理系统本身的变化,或缺乏知识,以及模型构建者使用假设,在所有基于模型的工程设计问题中,不确定性是不可避免的。因此,现实的数学模型应该考虑不确定性。由于存在不确定性,对建模方法有效性的评估必须基于随机测量来进行,从而为设计人员提供使用模型的信心。提出了一种基于不确定性传播的通用模型验证方法。该方法通过将评估工作转移到计算模型的不确定性传播上,将每个设计设置的物理测试数量减少到一个。响应面方法用于创建元模型,作为不确定性传播仿真模型的低成本近似值。该方法是通过检验有限元分析模型的有效性,以预测试样翻边过程中的回弹角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信