Benefits of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy for diabetic macular edema with and without vitreomacular adhesions

Yasmine Salem, A. Mohamed, M. Hashem, Mohamed Maher EL Hefny
{"title":"Benefits of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy for diabetic macular edema with and without vitreomacular adhesions","authors":"Yasmine Salem, A. Mohamed, M. Hashem, Mohamed Maher EL Hefny","doi":"10.4103/erj.erj_2_18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the effect of vitreomacular adhesion (VMA) in visual and anatomic outcomes in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) after intravitreal injection of ranibizumab (Lucentis®). Patients and Methods: This was a prospective cohort study that included thirty eyes of DME patients, divided into two groups according to their spectral-domain-optical coherence tomography image analysis at the baseline visit to identify the presence (VMA+) or absence (VMA−) of VMA. Patients with any degree of vitreomacular traction were not included in this study. VMA was classified by the size of adhesion into either focal (<1500 mm) or broad (>1500 mm). All patients received monthly 0.5 mg of intravitreal ranibizumab injection for 6 months. Patients were observed monthly for a 6-month period and their best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) were recorded. The incidence of posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) was observed. Results: Compared with baseline, there was a significant decrease in CMT after 6 months by 151.46 ± 121.47 and 139.33 ± 144.23 μm in VMA+ and VMA− groups, respectively (P = 0.681). The mean average improvement in BCVA was 10.21 ± 6.33 and 6.68 ± 6.35 letters in the VMA+ and VMA− groups, respectively. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P = 0.007). At 6 months, among the 15 eyes of VMA+ at baseline, 4 eyes demonstrated PVD and 11 eyes showed no change in VMA status. Conclusion: Patients having DME with VMA may achieve higher visual gain with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy. Presence of VMA should not preclude patients with DME from receiving anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy.","PeriodicalId":201997,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Retina Journal","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Retina Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/erj.erj_2_18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the effect of vitreomacular adhesion (VMA) in visual and anatomic outcomes in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) after intravitreal injection of ranibizumab (Lucentis®). Patients and Methods: This was a prospective cohort study that included thirty eyes of DME patients, divided into two groups according to their spectral-domain-optical coherence tomography image analysis at the baseline visit to identify the presence (VMA+) or absence (VMA−) of VMA. Patients with any degree of vitreomacular traction were not included in this study. VMA was classified by the size of adhesion into either focal (<1500 mm) or broad (>1500 mm). All patients received monthly 0.5 mg of intravitreal ranibizumab injection for 6 months. Patients were observed monthly for a 6-month period and their best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) were recorded. The incidence of posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) was observed. Results: Compared with baseline, there was a significant decrease in CMT after 6 months by 151.46 ± 121.47 and 139.33 ± 144.23 μm in VMA+ and VMA− groups, respectively (P = 0.681). The mean average improvement in BCVA was 10.21 ± 6.33 and 6.68 ± 6.35 letters in the VMA+ and VMA− groups, respectively. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P = 0.007). At 6 months, among the 15 eyes of VMA+ at baseline, 4 eyes demonstrated PVD and 11 eyes showed no change in VMA status. Conclusion: Patients having DME with VMA may achieve higher visual gain with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy. Presence of VMA should not preclude patients with DME from receiving anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy.
抗血管内皮生长因子治疗伴有或不伴有玻璃体黄斑粘连的糖尿病性黄斑水肿的益处
目的:我们旨在评估玻璃体内注射雷尼单抗(Lucentis®)后,玻璃体黄斑粘连(VMA)对糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)患者视觉和解剖结果的影响。患者和方法:这是一项前瞻性队列研究,纳入了30只DME患者的眼睛,根据基线就诊时的光谱域光学相干断层扫描图像分析分为两组,以确定VMA存在(VMA+)或不存在(VMA -)。有任何程度的玻璃体黄斑牵拉的患者不包括在本研究中。VMA根据粘连大小分为两个病灶(1500 mm)。所有患者每月接受0.5 mg玻璃体内注射,持续6个月。每月观察患者6个月,记录最佳矫正视力(BCVA)和中央黄斑厚度(CMT)。观察玻璃体后脱离(PVD)的发生率。结果:与基线相比,VMA+组和VMA−组6个月后CMT分别下降151.46±121.47 μm和139.33±144.23 μm (P = 0.681)。VMA+组和VMA−组的BCVA平均改善分别为10.21±6.33和6.68±6.35个字母。两组间差异有统计学意义(P = 0.007)。6个月时,基线时VMA+的15只眼中,4只眼出现PVD, 11只眼VMA状态无变化。结论:DME合并VMA患者采用抗血管内皮生长因子治疗可获得较高的视力增益。VMA的存在不应阻止DME患者接受抗血管内皮生长因子治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信